ArticleCureus2021
Neonatal Circumcision: What Are the Factors Affecting Parental Decision?
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parents' knowledge, attitude and practice regarding childhood circumcision: a cross-sectional study in the central region of Sichuan, China.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Neonatal Male Circumcision: Clearly Beneficial for Public Health or an Ethical Dilemma? A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision.International journal of impotence research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines state that the health benefits of circumcision outweigh the risks, but these benefits are not enough to recommend universal newborn circumcision. Therefore, it is the guardians' decision to circumcise their son. In this study, we assess the factors that influence the decision-making process for newborn circumcision.
methodsA prospective study was done from January to April 2020 for newborn circumcision. AAP guidelines were used as an educational tool and given to the parents on the day of patient circumcision assessment. On procedure day, a self-reported survey regarding the reasons for circumcision and the usefulness of the guideline as an educational resource was given to guardians.
resultsA total of 265 parents completed the survey. Of the study variables, the future health of the child and the circumcision status of the father were considered extremely important factors influencing the decision-making process for 168 (63.4%) and 90 (34%) guardians, respectively. The study showed that 226 (85.3%) of the parents found the AAP guidelines helpful whereas 39 (14.7%) did not.
conclusionOverall results suggest that the health of the child and the father of the child being circumcised are the primary factors that influence the guardians' decision to circumcise their child. In addition, providing parents with an educational resource such as the AAP guidelines policy statement prior to circumcision may serve as a way to supplement the discussion between parents and providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.