Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34925987›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Anatomical Evaluation of the Foramen Magnum on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images and Review of Literature.

İlhan Bahşi, Saliha Seda Adanır, Mustafa Orhan, Piraye Kervancıoğlu, Zeynep Simgül Büyükbeşe, Orhan Beger, Eda Didem Yalçın

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

İlhan BahşiDepartment of Anatomy, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, TUR.
Saliha Seda AdanırDepartment of Anatomy, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, TUR.
Mustafa OrhanDepartment of Anatomy, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, TUR.
Piraye KervancıoğluDepartment of Anatomy, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, TUR.
Zeynep Simgül BüyükbeşeSchool of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, TUR.
Orhan BegerDepartment of Anatomy, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, TUR.
Eda Didem YalçınDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, TUR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective The morphology and morphometry of the foramen magnum (FM), which provides a passageway to vital neurological structures that relay information to and from the brain and spinal cord, are significant for many surgical approaches and applications. It was aimed to investigate the morphometric and morphological features of the FM on the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and to review the literature in detail. Methods CBCT images of 400 individuals (200 males, 200 females, aged between 18 and 65) were evaluated by Planmeca Romexis Viewer. The length, width, perimeter, and area of the FM were examined and samples were classified according to shape. Also, the FM index (FMI) was calculated. Results The mean values of the length, width, and perimeter were found to be 36.75±2.50 mm, 32.55±2.93 mm, and 108.35±7.50 mm, respectively. The area of FM was found to be 941.81±128.26 mm

Indexed as

foramen magnummorphologymorphometryskull basesurgical anatomy

Identifiers

PMID34925987
PMCPMC8655366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.