Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34925961›Full record

ReviewJournal of European CME2021

Lupus Academy: Keeping Education Live, Virtually.

Julian Ball, Nicole Elzebroek, Eugene Pozniak

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of European CME, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julian BallOrchard Healthcare Communications, London, UK.
Nicole ElzebroekAdevez B.V, Veen, The Netherlands.
Eugene PozniakSiyemi Learning, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9744-1317

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delivering medical education meetings in person and online presents different challenges, as highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lupus Academy education programme is a decade-old initiative, led by a steering committee of 12 international experts in lupus, with an established following of over 7000 global learners. The COVID-19 pandemic has made educationalists think differently about ways to provide medical education. Early in the pandemic, the Lupus Academy created a new technical platform and scientific programme structure to deliver its education online to its global audience. Many challenges confronted the effective delivery of this education, including video steaming, audience engagement and interaction, and timely delivery of content across multiple time zones. The Lupus Academy adapted well, and its 2020 meeting was a success. The lessons from this meeting helped create a further improved meeting format for 2021, which like 2020 saw over 3000 participants from 101 counties attending. This success was driven by necessity, yet learners still want 'in-person education' . As and when the world opens for travel, a newfound digital literacy will create hybrid programmes that serve both 'in-person meetings' with digital elements, bringing education to a broader audience online at the same time.

Indexed as

cmecovidcpdDigitisationeducationlupuspandemicvirtual

Identifiers

PMID34925961
PMCPMC8676698
OpenAlexW4206507608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.