ArticlePsychology of violence2021
Test-Retest Reliabilities of Four Tactic-first Sexual Violence History Questionnaires.
Article in Psychology of violence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Study Title-Based Framing Effects on Reports of Sexual Violence and Associated Risk Factors in College Students.Journal of interpersonal violence · 2022Trial
- Nonconsensual Sexual Experience Acknowledgment: Exploring the Roles of Gender Identity, Sexual Aggression Myths, and Psychological Inflexibility.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring Measurement Strategies for Identifying Multiple-Perpetrator Sexual Violence: Higher Prevalence Rates Than Past Research.Aggressive behavior · 2025Article
- A Qualitatively-Informed Approach to Examining the Construct Validity of Alcohol-Involved Sexual Violence.Sexuality & culture · 2025Article
- Comparison of Sexual Violence Perpetration Rates Among Gay, Lesbian and Heterosexual Cisgender Adults.Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP · 2025Article
- "I Think You Covered the Three Levels of Drugs and Consent": Qualitatively Testing Different Operationalizations of an Alcohol and Other Drugs-Involved Sexual Violence.Archives of sexual behavior · 2024Article
- Words Can Hurt: A Taxonomy of Verbally Pressured Sexual Exploitation in the SES-V.Journal of sex research · 2024Article
- The Revised Sexual Experiences Survey Victimization Version (SES-V): Conceptualization, Modifications, Items and Scoring.Journal of sex research · 2024Article
- Motives for Sex and Sexual Perpetration in College Men: An Exploratory Study.Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment · 2024Article
- Measuring sexual violence perpetration acknowledgment: Testing the effects of label and response format.Aggressive behavior · 2023Article
- Coercive Condom Use Resistance: A Scoping Review.Psychology of violence · 2023Article
- Trauma Symptoms and Deliberate Self-Harm Among Sexual Violence Survivors: Examining State Emotion Regulation and Reactivity as Dual Mechanisms.Psychology of violence · 2023Article
- An Experimental Test of the Impact of Varying Questionnaire Response Format on Prevalence Rates for Sexual Violence Victimization and Perpetration.Journal of interpersonal violence · 2022Article
- A Quantitative Intersectional Exploration of Sexual Violence and Mental Health among Bi + People: Looking within and across Race and Gender.Journal of bisexuality · 2022Article
- Participant Acceptability of Questionnaires Impacts Sexual Victimization Prevalence Rates.Journal of child sexual abuseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe present study documented, compared, and contrasted the test-retest reliabilities of the victimization and perpetration forms of a Tactic-first Sexual Experiences Survey (T-SESs) and the Post-Refusal Sexual Persistence Scales (PRSPSs).
methods243 Mechanical Turk workers (116 women, 124 men) completed four questionnaires in a randomized order via anonymous web survey at Time 1 and approximately one week later at Time 2.
resultsThere were consistent gender differences in test-retest estimates. When assessing a history of victimization in women, both the T-SES and the PRSPS demonstrated evidence of minimal to good reliability (κ > .61, ICC = .86-92) while for men the PRSPS (κ = .64) was more consistent than the T-SES (κ = .59). When assessing a history of perpetration, there were fewer gender differences although post-hoc analyses suggest potential gender differences in assessing substance use facilitated perpetration (κ .48-.83) but were limited by few cases. Continuous scoring approaches were the most reliable, dichotomous scores were mostly reliable, and categorical scores generally did not meet minimal acceptable standards. For the rape victimization acknowledgment items, we found strong evidence of reliability for women (κ = .89,
conclusionsAll four questionnaires exhibited good evidence of one-week test-retest reliability when scored continuously. Evidence of reliability was strongest with the populations and constructs most well studied - victimization history among women and perpetration history among men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.