ArticleDigital health
Clinical trial participation in America: The roles of eHealth engagement and patient-provider communication.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- An innovative and comprehensive approach to community health and research engagement using the Social Ecological Model.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Knowledge of Clinical Trials Among US Cancer Survivors: Cross-Sectional Study of HINTS-SEER Data.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Comparison of Participant and Site Perceptions of Decentralized Clinical Trials in the USA.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Article
- How do electronic personal health information technologies enhance obesity prevention behaviors? Examining the roles of obesity risk perception and body weight.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Smartwatch- and smartphone-based remote assessment of brain health and detection of mild cognitive impairment.Nature medicine · 2025Observational
- COVID-19 clinical trial participation and awareness in Texas.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Article
- Disparities in cancer clinical trials information-seeking: Findings from the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service.Patient education and counseling · 2024Article
- Understanding willingness and barriers to participate in clinical trials during pregnancy and lactation: findings from a US study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- What Is Ailing Oncology Clinical Trials? Can We Fix Them?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Cognitive Assessment with Cognivue Clarity®: Psychometric Properties and Normative Ranges in a Diverse Population.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024Article
- The influence of political ideology on clinical trial knowledge, invitation, and participation among adults in the United States.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePublic participation in a clinical trial is the foundation of clinical research and the cornerstone for the discovery of new treatment and improving health outcomes. This study aims to examine how eHealth engagement, patient-provider communication, and clinical trial knowledge are associated with clinical trial participation in the United States.
methodsData were drawn from the Health Information National Trends Survey Iteration 5 Cycle 4 conducted in 2020. The sample included 3865 American adults aged 18 years and above. Path analysis using structural equation modeling and hierarchical linear regression was performed to examine the effects of eHealth engagement and patient-provider communication on clinical trial participation.
resultsAbout 5% of American adults have ever participated in a clinical trial. Younger adults, males, minorities, and people with lower education, less clinical trial knowledge, and less eHealth engagement were less likely to participate. After controlling for demographic variables, we found that more eHealth engagement led to a better knowledge of clinical trials, which was strongly associated with participation. Further, patient-centered communication did not directly lead to clinical trial participation; instead, it positively moderated the relationship between clinical trial knowledge and participation.
conclusionsThe national survey data indicate that American participation in clinical trials remains low and a significant disparity exists. Within the context of the eHealth movement, it is critical to implement targeted interventions to improve clinical trial knowledge, address the digital divide, and enhance patient-centered communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.