Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34925864›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2021

Development and Preliminary Psychometric Testing of an Adult Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management (CKD-SM) Questionnaire.

Michelle D Smekal, Maoliosa Donald, Heather Beanlands, Sharon Straus, Gwen Herrington, Blair Waldvogel, Dwight Sparkes, Maria Delgado, Aminu Bello, Brenda R Hemmelgarn

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07726589 (The Relationship Between Psychological Well-being, Social Support, and Disease Self-management in Patients With Diabetic Nephropathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07726589 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Relationship Between Psychological Well-being, Social Support, and Disease Self-management in Patients With Diabetic Nephropathy

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2026 to 2028Enrolled161ConditionsDiabetic Kidney Disease (DKD), Type 2 Diabetes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle D SmekalDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0960-3628
Maoliosa DonaldDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Heather BeanlandsDaphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5421-4205
Sharon StrausDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gwen HerringtonCan-SOLVE CKD Network-Patient Partner, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Blair WaldvogelCan-SOLVE CKD Network-Patient Partner, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Dwight SparkesCan-SOLVE CKD Network-Patient Partner, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Maria DelgadoCan-SOLVE CKD Network-Patient Partner, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Aminu BelloDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Brenda R HemmelgarnDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of Calgary · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAToronto Metropolitan University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-management focused interventions to slow chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression are increasingly common. However, valid self-report instruments to evaluate the effectiveness of self-management interventions in CKD are limited.

objectiveWe sought to develop and conduct preliminary psychometric testing of a patient-informed questionnaire to assess aspects of CKD self-management for patients with CKD categories G2-G5 (not on kidney replacement therapy [KRT]).

designSelf-administered electronic questionnaires (multiphase).

settingOnline. SAMPLE: Canadian adults with CKD categories G2-G5 (not on KRT).

methodsThe CKD-SM questionnaire was developed and tested in 4 phases. First, we used a content coverage matrix to identify potential questionnaire items based on existing self-efficacy questionnaires, self-management theories, and patient-identified priorities. Second, the draft questionnaire was reviewed by a multidisciplinary expert panel using percent acceptance to finalize the questionnaire. Third, we tested an electronic version of the questionnaire with patients with CKD, evaluating preliminary psychometric properties including internal consistency, face validity, and content validity. Finally, we tested the questionnaire within a CKD self-management intervention study and collected data on internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and pre-post responsiveness.

resultsWe identified 22 potential questionnaire items for the first round of expert panel review. Thirteen items were retained in the first round. Eleven additional items were tested in the second review round and all were retained. Of the 24 items retained following expert review of the questionnaire, 21 had greater than 85% acceptance (content validity index [CVI], 0.75-1.00) and 3 items had 75% acceptance (CVI, 0.5). Thirty patients with CKD from across Canada participated in the pilot testing, and 29 patients participated in the CKD self-management intervention study. In the pilot test, several participants requested inclusion of a question that explicitly addressed mental health; consequently, an additional item relating to mental health was included prior to the intervention study (final questionnaire total was 25 items). Internal consistency (Cronbach α) was high for both the pilot (0.921) and intervention study (0.912). Preintervention test-retest reliability, measured with intraclass correlation coefficient, was acceptable (0.732, 95% confidence interval, 0.686-0.771, LIMITATIONS: The sample sizes were small for each component of the analysis, and the sampling was consecutive/convenience-based.

conclusionsWe used self-management theories, patient-identified self-management needs, expert review, and conducted preliminary psychometric testing to finalize a CKD self-management questionnaire for patients with G2-G5 CKD (not on KRT). The finalized questionnaire assesses aspects of self-management for individuals with CKD and may be particularly helpful as a tool to evaluate self-management interventions among patients with CKD.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseasepatient-reported outcomespre-dialysisquestionnaire developmentself-management

Identifiers

PMID34925864
PMCPMC8671825
OpenAlexW4205517117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.