Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34925829›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational immunology2021

C-reactive protein flare-response predicts long-term efficacy to first-line anti-PD-1-based combination therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Niklas Klümper, Philipp Schmucker, Oliver Hahn, Benedikt Höh, Angelika Mattigk, Severine Banek, Jörg Ellinger, Julia Heinzelbecker, Danijel Sikic, Markus Eckstein and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Early kinetics of C-reactive protein as prognosticator for survival in a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer under first-line therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Niklas KlümperDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology University Hospital Bonn (UKB) Bonn Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3258-0586
Philipp SchmuckerDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology Julius Maximilians University Medical Center of Würzburg Würzburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3487-0560
Oliver HahnDepartment of Urology University Medical Center Göttingen Göttingen Germany.
Benedikt HöhDepartment of Urology University Hospital Frankfurt Goethe University Frankfurt am Main Frankfurt Germany.
Angelika MattigkDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8710-458X
Severine BanekDepartment of Urology University Hospital Frankfurt Goethe University Frankfurt am Main Frankfurt Germany.
Jörg EllingerDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology University Hospital Bonn (UKB) Bonn Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7526-0857
Julia HeinzelbeckerDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology Saarland University Homburg/Saar Germany.
Danijel SikicDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology University Hospital Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg Erlangen Germany.
Markus EcksteinComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN) Erlangen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5418-3349
Arne StraußDepartment of Urology University Medical Center Göttingen Göttingen Germany.
Friedemann ZengerlingDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany.
Michael HölzelInstitute of Experimental Oncology University Hospital Bonn (UKB) Bonn Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4048-8824
Philip ZeuschnerDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology Saarland University Homburg/Saar Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8898-6588
Charis KalogirouDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology Julius Maximilians University Medical Center of Würzburg Würzburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3802-940X
University Hospital Bonn · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DESaarland University · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesImmune checkpoint blockade (IO) has revolutionised the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Early C-reactive protein (CRP) kinetics, especially the recently introduced CRP flare-response phenomenon, has shown promising results to predict IO efficacy in mRCC, but has only been studied in second line or later. Here, we aimed to validate the predictive value of early CRP kinetics for 1st-line treatment of mRCC with αPD-1 plus either αCTLA-4 (IO+IO) or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO+TKI).

methodsIn this multicentre retrospective study, we investigated the predictive potential of early CRP kinetics during 1st-line IO therapy. Ninety-five patients with mRCC from six tertiary referral centres with either IO+IO (

resultsOur data validate the predictive potential of early CRP kinetics in 1st-line immunotherapy in mRCC. CRP responders, especially CRP flare-responders, had significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with non-CRP responders (median PFS: CRP flare-responder: 19.2 months vs. responders: 16.2 vs. non-CRP responders: 5.6,

conclusionsEarly CRP kinetics appears to be a low-cost and easy-to-implement on-treatment biomarker to predict response to 1st-line IO combination therapy. It has potential to optimise therapy monitoring and might represent a new standard of care biomarker for immunotherapy in mRCC.

Indexed as

biomarkercheckpoint inhibitionC‐reactive proteinCRP flare‐responseimmunotherapymetastatic renal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID34925829
PMCPMC8648498
OpenAlexW4205287294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.