Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34925634›Full record

ArticleSexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP2021

The Impact of the 2016 Presidential Elections on Transgender and Gender Diverse People.

Sarah F Price, Jae A Puckett, Richard Mocarski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. State-Level Policy Environments, Discrimination, and Victimization among Sexual and Gender Minority People.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. The 2016 United States presidential election's impact on families with transgender adolescents in New England.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah F PriceCollege of Communication and Information Sciences, University of Alabama, 901 University Blvd, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401.
Jae A PuckettDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, 316 Physics Road, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Richard MocarskiDivision of Research, University of Nebraska at Kearney, 2134 Warner Hall, Kearney, NE 68845.

Funding

Predictors of Substance Use and HIV Risk in Transgender Men and WomenF32DA038557 · NIDA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI PUCKETT, JULIA · 2014 to 2014
$50k
NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA038557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith Trump's presidency came a rise in the oppression of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people, as the nation witnessed a removal of protections for TGD people.

methodWe examined the daily experiences of 181 TGD individuals (ages 16-40,

resultsDuring 2016 presidential election, participants reported a rise in marginalization stress and the subsequent impact on safety, mental health, and well-being. There were three emergent themes: External Rejection and Stigma from Dominant Culture; Supporting the TGD Community; and Fear for the Self and Development of Proximal Stressors.

conclusionIn line with marginalization stress theory, participants vocalized the progression from exterior stigmatization to proximal stressors and their heightened sense of vigilance and fear of the dominant culture.

Indexed as

marginalization stressminority stresspoliticsstigmatransgendertransgender and gender diverse

Identifiers

PMID34925634
PMCPMC8673739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.