ArticleMaedica2021
Obstetric and Perinatal Complications Associated with Assisted Reproductive Techniques - Review.
Article in Maedica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The relationship between hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Reproductive health · 2024Pooled it
- Does the risk of neurodevelopment disorders in children differ with different ART treatments? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Placental expression and methylation of angiogenic factors in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies from India.Epigenomics · 2025Article
- The effects of endometrial thickness on outcomes of pregnancy following embryo transfer: A retrospective cohort.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2024Article
- Successful Fetal Reduction in Early Second Trimester: Series of Three Cases Conceived With Infertility Treatment.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, the use of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) has witnessed a significant increase worldwide. Although most of these pregnancies have a good prognosis, studies show that ART is associated with a risk of obstetric and perinatal complications, compared to pregnancies conceived spontaneously. It is considered that the risk is directly proportional to the number of transferred embryos, thus multiple pregnancies are an independent risk factor that supports the large-scale implementation of single embryo transfer protocols. Simultaneously, studies report obstetric and perinatal complications in singleton pregnancies obtained after ART and it is not possible to establish whether parental or procedural factors are the causal determinants. The purpose of this article is to summarize the risk of maternal-fetal complications associated with ART.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.