ArticleMaedica2021
Ability of Calcium Silicate and Epoxy Resin-based Sealers to Fill the Artificial Lateral Canals in the Presence or Absence of Smear Layer.
Article in Maedica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Push-out bond strength evaluation of endodontic bioceramic sealer (Bioroot RCS) after final irrigation with different intracanal irrigants: A comparative in vitro study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Apical Microleakage of Endoseal MTA, AH26, and Sure-Seal Root Canal Sealers Using a Bacterial Leakage Model: An In-Vitro Study.Frontiers in dentistry · 2025Article
- Dentinal tubular penetration ability of epoxy resin-based and bioceramic-based root canal sealers.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Comparison of Easydo Activator, ultrasonic and needle irrigation techniques on sealer penetration and smear layer removal in vitro.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Comparison of push-out bond strength of endodontic sealers after root canal drying with different techniques.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.