ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2021
Phase II study of DHP107 (oral paclitaxel) in the first-line treatment of HER2-negative recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (OPTIMAL study).
Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03315364 (A Multinational, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase II/III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Liporaxel®), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multinational, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase II/III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Liporaxel® (Oral Paclitaxel) Compared to Taxol® (IV Paclitaxel) as First-line Therapy in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic HER2 Negative Breast Cancer
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A randomized, open-label, two-way crossover clinical trial to evaluate the food effect on pharmacokinetics and safety of DHP107 in patients with advanced solid tumors: the FEEL study.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2026Trial
- OPERA: a phase II study of DHP107 (oral paclitaxel) versus intravenous paclitaxel in patients with HER2-negative recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Trial
- Recent paclitaxel formulation strategies: expanding the therapeutic index by addressing biopharmaceutical and toxicity limitations.Archives of pharmacal research · 2026Review
- Recent advances in cancer nanomedicine: From smart targeting to personalized therapeutics - pioneering a new era in precision oncology.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Article
- Nanomedicines: Emerging Platforms in Smart Chemotherapy Treatment-A Recent Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Anti-cancer effects of DHP107 on canine mammary gland cancer examined through in-vitro and in-vivo mouse xenograft models.BMC veterinary research · 2024Article
- Self-assembled nanoformulations of paclitaxel for enhanced cancer theranostics.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStandard intravenous (IV) paclitaxel is associated with hypersensitivity/toxicity. Alternative IV formulations have improved tolerability but still require frequent hospital visits and IV infusion. DHP107 is a novel oral formulation of paclitaxel that is approved in South Korea for the treatment of gastric cancer.
methodsThis multicenter, phase II study using a Simon's two-stage design investigated the efficacy and safety of DHP107 200 mg/m
resultsThirty-six patients were enrolled and 31 were assessable for efficacy. Patient median age was 57 years (range = 34-81) and 11 (31%) had triple-negative disease. A median of seven cycles (range = 1-28) of DHP107 was administered. Objective response rate was 55% (17 patients), all partial responses, according to the investigator's decision and independent central review (ICR), and 44% (4/9 patients) in those with triple-negative disease. Disease control rate (partial response and stable disease) was 74% (23 patients) according to the investigator's decision and ICR. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population of all enrolled participants, the objective response rate was 50% (18/36 patients). Median progression-free survival was 8.9 months [95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.2-12.3) and median time to treatment failure was 8.0 months (95% CI: 4.2-10.0). DHP107 had an acceptable toxicity profile. All patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events; the most common adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (81% all grades and 78% grade ⩾ 3) followed by peripheral sensory neuropathy (61% all grades and 8% grade 3). However, there was no febrile neutropenia or sepsis.
conclusionDHP107 showed promising efficacy and acceptable tolerability in this phase II study and is currently being investigated in the OPTIMAL phase III study (NCT03315364).
trial registrationThis trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03315364.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.