Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34925521›Full record

ArticleCommunication teacher2021

Using structured writing communities to facilitate undergraduate research writing.

Natasha R Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communication teacher, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Natasha R BrownDepartment of Communication, Indiana University Northwest, Gary, IN.ORCID 0000-0003-1467-237X

Funding

Obesity Health Disparities Research PRIDE Program (OHD PRIDE)R25HL126145 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI BEECH, BETTINA M., BRUCE, MARINO A · 2014 to 2025
$3.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R25 HL126145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article outlines a structured writing community activity originally created to assist communication majors complete their capstone projects. This activity draws upon the Writing Accountability Group (WAG) strategy that has been utilized to facilitate graduate student and early career faculty writing. The current article provides an overview of a semester-long activity that builds upon the WAG format by providing several avenues of additional support to help undergraduate students establish goals and make incremental progress on a specified project over the course of the semester or quarter session. Information regarding how to facilitate a structured writing community as well as potential assessments are provided. Strategies to help instructors overcome barriers to success are also outlined. COURSES: Communication capstone, Communication theory, Research methods, or any other course that requires a high-stakes assignment.

objectivesStudents will (1) develop achievable, short-term goals related to project completion; (2) prioritize tasks associated with project completion; and subsequently (3) execute and submit a completed capstone project or senior thesis.

Indexed as

Social Cognitive Theorystructured writing communityundergraduateWriting

Identifiers

PMID34925521
PMCPMC8675937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.