ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021
Pseudo-188D: Phage Protein Prediction Based on a Model of Pseudo-188D.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phages have seriously affected the biochemical systems of the world, and not only are phages related to our health, but medical treatments for many cancers and skin infections are related to phages; therefore, this paper sought to identify phage proteins. In this paper, a Pseudo-188D model was established. The digital features of the phage were extracted by PseudoKNC, an appropriate vector was selected by the AdaBoost tool, and features were extracted by 188D. Then, the extracted digital features were combined together, and finally, the viral proteins of the phage were predicted by a stochastic gradient descent algorithm. Our model effect reached 93.4853%. To verify the stability of our model, we randomly selected 80% of the downloaded data to train the model and used the remaining 20% of the data to verify the robustness of our model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.