ReviewFrontiers in psychology2021
On Neuroeducation: Why and How to Improve Neuroscientific Literacy in Educational Professionals.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploratory study of protective factors against belief in neuromyths in in-service teachers at Brazilian vocational-technical high school.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Neurophysiological assessment of biometric patterns during semi-immersive and traditional learning experiences in the humanities.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Educational neuromyths in higher education: beliefs about the brain and learning among university faculty members.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Brain-Inspired Multisensory Learning: A Systematic Review of Neuroplasticity and Cognitive Outcomes in Adult Multicultural and Second Language Acquisition.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Looking at Philosophy for Children and Its Outcomes Through a Neuroscience Lens.Basic and clinical neuroscience · 2025Review
- Preparing physiotherapists for the future: the development and evaluation of an innovative curriculum.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Specific educational strategies using the Anatomage table for physical and occupational therapy students: a questionnaire-based survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Neuroscience-informed psychoeducation for addiction: a conceptual and feasibility study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Lobish: Symbolic Language for Interpreting Electroencephalogram Signals in Language Detection Using Channel-Based Transformation and Pattern.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Enhancing knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to dental caries in mothers and caregivers of children through a neuroeducational strategy.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Bridging minds and machines in Industry 5.0: neurobiological approach.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Neuromyths and knowledge about intellectual giftedness in a highly educated multilingual country.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- How understanding and strengthening brain networks can contribute to elementary education.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- The combined value of executive functions and self-regulated learning to predict differences in study success among higher education students.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- On the Application of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience in Educational Environments.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Draw me a brain: The use of drawing as a tool to examine children's developing knowledge about the "black box".Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New findings from the neurosciences receive much interest for use in the applied field of education. For the past 15 years, neuroeducation and the application of neuroscience knowledge were seen to have promise, but there is presently some lack of progress. The present paper states that this is due to several factors. Neuromyths are still prevalent, and there is a confusion of tongues between the many neurodisciplines and the domains of behavioral and educational sciences. Second, a focus upon cognitive neuroimaging research has yielded findings that are scientifically relevant, but cannot be used for direct application in the classroom. A third factor pertains to the emphasis which has been on didactics and teaching, whereas the promise of neuroeducation for the teacher may lie more on pedagogical inspiration and support. This article states that the most important knowledge and insights have to do with the notion of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.