ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2021
A Toolbox and Crowdsourcing Platform for Automatic Labeling of Independent Components in Electroencephalography.
Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Mixed Longitudinal EEG Study of Sensorimotor Rhythm Modulation and Its Relationship with Language Development in Children Aged 3-10 Years.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Active avoidance of potential threat is reflected in oscillatory brain activity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Atypical reward anticipation in impulsive individuals: evidence from EEG and experiential delay discounting.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Neural mechanisms of altruistic decision-making: EEG functional connectivity network analysis.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2024Article
- Distinct brain systems are involved in subjective minute estimation with eyes open or closed: EEG source analysis study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Restoration of natural somatic sensations to the amputees: finding the right combination of neurostimulation methods.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Effect of presentation rate on auditory processing in Rett syndrome: event-related potential study.Molecular autism · 2023Article
- Abnormal spectral and scale-free properties of resting-state EEG in girls with Rett syndrome.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Does the Potocki-Lupski Syndrome Convey the Autism Spectrum Disorder Phenotype? Case Report and Scoping Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- iCanClean Improves Independent Component Analysis of Mobile Brain Imaging with EEG.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Photic Stimulation Has an Impact on the Reproduction of 10 s Intervals Only in Healthy Controls but Not in Patients with Schizophrenia: The EEG Study.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Methods for motion artifact reduction in online brain-computer interface experiments: a systematic review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Review
- Opposite effects of rapid auditory stimulation on tetanized and non-tetanized tone of adjacent frequency: Mismatch negativity study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Clinical EEG of Rett Syndrome: Group Analysis Supplemented with Longitudinal Case Report.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Independent Component Analysis (ICA) is a conventional approach to exclude non-brain signals such as eye movements and muscle artifacts from electroencephalography (EEG). A rejection of independent components (ICs) is usually performed in semiautomatic mode and requires experts' involvement. As also revealed by our study, experts' opinions about the nature of a component often disagree, highlighting the need to develop a robust and sustainable automatic system for EEG ICs classification. The current article presents a toolbox and crowdsourcing platform for Automatic Labeling of Independent Components in Electroencephalography (ALICE) available via link http://alice.adase.org/. The ALICE toolbox aims to build a sustainable algorithm to remove artifacts and find specific patterns in EEG signals using ICA decomposition based on accumulated experts' knowledge. The difference from previous toolboxes is that the ALICE project will accumulate different benchmarks based on crowdsourced visual labeling of ICs collected from publicly available and in-house EEG recordings. The choice of labeling is based on the estimation of IC time-series, IC amplitude topography, and spectral power distribution. The platform allows supervised machine learning (ML) model training and re-training on available data subsamples for better performance in specific tasks (i.e., movement artifact detection in healthy or autistic children). Also, current research implements the novel strategy for consentient labeling of ICs by several experts. The provided baseline model could detect noisy IC and components related to the functional brain oscillations such as alpha and mu rhythm. The ALICE project implies the creation and constant replenishment of the IC database, which will improve ML algorithms for automatic labeling and extraction of non-brain signals from EEG. The toolbox and current dataset are open-source and freely available to the researcher community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.