Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34924980›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2021

NAIAD-2020: Characteristics of Motor Evoked Potentials After 3-Day Exposure to Dry Immersion in Women.

Inna Nosikova, Alexandra Riabova, Liubov Amirova, Vladimir Kitov, Elena Tomilovskaya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Inna NosikovaLaboratory of Gravitational Physiology of the Sensorimotor System, Institute of Biomedical Problems of Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Alexandra RiabovaLaboratory of Gravitational Physiology of the Sensorimotor System, Institute of Biomedical Problems of Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Liubov AmirovaLaboratory of Gravitational Physiology of the Sensorimotor System, Institute of Biomedical Problems of Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir KitovLaboratory of Gravitational Physiology of the Sensorimotor System, Institute of Biomedical Problems of Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Elena TomilovskayaLaboratory of Gravitational Physiology of the Sensorimotor System, Institute of Biomedical Problems of Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Institute of Biomedical Problems · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As female astronauts participate in space flight more and more frequently, there is a demand for research on how the female body adapts to the microgravity environment. In particular, there is very little research on how the neuromuscular system reacts to gravitational unloading in women. We aimed to estimate changes in motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the lower leg muscles in women after 3-day exposure to Dry Immersion (DI), which is one of the most widely used ground models of microgravity. Six healthy female volunteers (mean age 30.17 ± 5.5 years) with a natural menstrual cycle participated in this experiment. MEPs were recorded from the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles twice before DI, on the day of DI completion, and 3 days after DI, during the recovery period. To evoke motor responses, transcranial and trans-spinal magnetic stimulation was applied. We showed that changes in MEP characteristics after DI exposure were different depending on the stimulation site, but were similar for both muscles. For trans-spinal stimulation, MEP thresholds decreased compared to baseline values, and amplitudes, on the contrary, increased, resembling the phenomenon of hypogravitational hyperreflexia. This finding is in line with data observed in other experiments on both male and female participants. MEPs to transcranial stimulation had an opposing dynamic, which may have resulted from the small group size and large inter-subject variability, or from hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle. Central motor conduction time remained unchanged, suggesting that pyramidal tract conductibility was not affected by DI exposure. More research is needed to explore the underlying mechanisms.

Indexed as

Dry ImmersionmicrogravityNAIAD-2020support unloadingTMStrans-spinal magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34924980
PMCPMC8671694
OpenAlexW3216698663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.