Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34924819›Full record

ReviewCurrent infectious disease reports2021

Therapeutic Options for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Where Are We Now?

Esther Y Golnabi, James M Sanders, Meagan L Johns, Kevin Lin, Jessica K Ortwine, Wenjing Wei, Norman S Mang, James B Cutrell

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current infectious disease reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Aptamer-Based Strategies to Address Challenges in COVID-19 Diagnosis and Treatments.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Esther Y GolnabiDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, US.ORCID 0000-0001-5490-5989
James M SandersDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, US.
Meagan L JohnsDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, US.
Kevin LinDepartment of Pharmacy, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, US.
Jessica K OrtwineDepartment of Pharmacy, Parkland Hospital, Dallas, US.
Wenjing WeiDepartment of Pharmacy, Parkland Hospital, Dallas, US.
Norman S MangDepartment of Pharmacy, Parkland Hospital, Dallas, US.
James B CutrellDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, US.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USParkland Memorial Hospital · USOchsner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRapidly evolving treatment paradigms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) introduce challenges for clinicians to keep up with the pace of published literature and to critically appraise the voluminous data produced. This review summarizes the clinical evidence from key studies examining the place of therapy of recommended drugs and management strategies for COVID-19. RECENT

findingsThe global magnitude and duration of the pandemic have resulted in a flurry of interventional treatment trials evaluating both novel and repurposed drugs targeting various aspects of the viral life cycle. Additionally, clinical observations have documented various stages or phases of COVID-19 and underscored the importance of timing for the efficacy of studied therapies. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, many observational, retrospective, and randomized controlled studies have been conducted to guide management of COVID-19 using drug therapies and other management strategies. Large, randomized, or adaptive platform trials have proven the most informative to guide recommended treatments to-date. Antimicrobial stewardship programs can play a pivotal role in ensuring appropriate use of COVID-19 therapies based on evolving clinical data and limiting unnecessary antibiotics given low rates of co-infection. SUMMARY: Given the rapidly evolving medical literature and treatment paradigms, it is recommended to reference continuously updated, curated guidelines from national and international sources. While the drugs and management strategies mentioned in this review represent the current state of recommendations, many therapies are still under investigation to further define optimal COVID-19 treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11908-021-00769-8.

Indexed as

AnticoagulationAntimicrobial stewardshipAntiviralsCOVID-19ImmunomodulatorsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34924819
PMCPMC8665318
OpenAlexW4200259074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.