Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34924806›Full record

ArticleCollegian (Royal College of Nursing, Australia)2021

Nurse wellbeing during the coronavirus (2019) pandemic: A qualitative descriptive study.

Rebecca J Jarden, Aaron J Jarden, Tracey J Weiland, Glenn Taylor, Naomi Brockenshire, Michelle Rutherford, Catherine Carbery, Kate Moroney, Marie F Gerdtz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Collegian (Royal College of Nursing, Australia), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rebecca J JardenDepartment of Nursing, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, 161 Barry Street, Carlton, Vic, 3053, Australia.
Aaron J JardenCentre for Wellbeing Science, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, Kwong Lee Dow Building, 234 Queensberry Street, Parkville, Melbourne, Vic, 3053, Australia.
Tracey J WeilandMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, Melbourne, Vic, 3053, Australia.
Glenn TaylorNursing and Midwifery Health Program, Richmond, Vic, Australia.
Naomi BrockenshireDepartment of Nursing, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, 161 Barry Street, Carlton, Melbourne, Vic, 3053, Australia.
Michelle RutherfordEastern Health, 5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Catherine CarberyMelbourne Health, 300 Grattan Street, Parkville Vic, 3050, Australia.
Kate MoroneyGoulburn Valley Health, Graham Street, Shepparton, Vic, Australia.
Marie F GerdtzDepartment of Nursing, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, 161 Barry Street, Carlton, Vic, 3053, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe wellbeing of individuals influences organisational outcomes. Insight into nurses' wellbeing is crucial to a sustaining a high-quality workforce.

aimTo describe nurses' perceptions and experiences of wellbeing, work wellbeing, and mental health.

methodUsing a qualitative descriptive design, semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcribed verbatim, analysed inductively and thematically, and reported per consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research.

findingsNine Australian nurses were interviewed in 2020, each for 60 to 90 minutes. These nurses had a broad range of clinical roles and years of experience in metropolitan healthcare organisations. Six themes, each related to nurse wellbeing, depicted: (i) value and sense of purpose from nursing, yet also negative consequences of losing sight of oneself within the nursing role; (ii) work nurses did to disengage from their job and create a balance within their life; (iii) significance of the team and senior team as a source of both strength and opportunity for wellbeing; (iv) a range of wellbeing initiatives with a perception these were often developed, and for use, in response to crisis as opposed to preventative or proactive measures; (v) value of additional nurse wellbeing education and promotion of available support; and (vi) novel challenges and ways to wellbeing during times where resources were stretched and usual support systems impacted. DISCUSSION: Identified positive and negative consequences of nursing must be addressed when developing targeted wellbeing interventions.

conclusionNew ways of working and supporting individual, team and organisational wellbeing are needed for flourishing working environments. Potential strategies to either leverage or mitigate the positive and negative consequences of nursing are offered.

Indexed as

COVID-19ExperiencesMental healthNursesPerceptionsWellbeingWork wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID34924806
PMCPMC8669672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.