ArticleNoro psikiyatri arsivi2021
The Reliability and Validity of The Turkish Form of Berger HIV Stigma Scale.
Article in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Relationships Between Internalized Stigma, Depression, andHealth-Related Quality of Life in Individuals Living with HIV.Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
- HIV-related microaggressions and depressive symptoms among people living with HIV: the mediating roles of internalised stigma and coping with shame.Sexually transmitted infections · 2025Article
- Addressing HIV stigma in healthcare, community, and legislative settings in Central and Eastern Europe.AIDS research and therapy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHIV-related stigma towards people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) creates a barrier in access to quality health care, affects mental health and leads to poor treatment adherence. Assessment of different components of HIV-related stigma is needed to develop appropriate strategies for prevention and intervention. The aim of this study was to translate and adapt Berger HIV Stigma Scale to Turkish and assess its reliability and validity.
methodThe Turkish version of the 40 item, 4-point Likert-type self-report HIV Stigma Scale, as well as Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and sociodemographic data form were administered to 95 PLWHA.
resultsThe items of the scale whose face validity was found to be sufficient, were loaded on four factors in the explanatory factor analysis: Internalised Stigmatization (16 items); Concerns with Public Attitudes (12 items); Negative Self Image (9 items); and Disclosure Concerns (8 items). This structure explained 46.71% of the variance after an item was removed based on the analysis. All subscales had acceptable internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha coefficients .802-.934. BDE scores had moderate positive correlations with Internalized Stigmatization; Concerns with Public Attitudes; Disclosure Concerns subscale scores (r
conclusionOur findings showed that the Turkish form of Berger HIV Stigma Scale is a reliable and valid tool for measuring HIV-related stigma in PLWHA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.