Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34924388›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2022

Innate Preferences Affect Results of Object Recognition Task in Wild Type and Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Models.

Maria Rosaria Tropea, Giulia Sanfilippo, Federico Giannino, Valentina Davì, Walter Gulisano, Daniela Puzzo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Rosaria TropeaDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Physiology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Giulia SanfilippoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Physiology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Federico GianninoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Physiology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Valentina DavìDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Physiology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Walter GulisanoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Physiology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Daniela PuzzoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Physiology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
University of Catania · ITOasi Maria SS · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObject recognition task (ORT) is a widely used behavioral paradigm to assess memory in rodent models, due to its easy technical execution, the lack of aversive stressful stimuli, and the possibility to repeat the test on the same animals. However, mouse exploration might be strongly influenced by a variety of variables.

objectiveTo study whether innate preferences influenced exploration in male and female wild type mice and the Alzheimer's disease (AD) model 3xTg.

methodsWe first evaluated how object characteristics (material, size, and shape) influence exploration levels, latency, and exploration modality. Based on these findings, we evaluated whether these innate preferences biased the results of ORT performed in wild type mice and AD models.

resultsAssessment of Exploration levels, i.e., the time spent in exploring a certain object in respect to the total exploration time, revealed an innate preference for objects made in shiny materials, such as metal and glass. A preference for bigger objects characterized by higher affordance was also evident, especially in male mice. When performing ORT, exploration was highly influenced by these innate preferences. Indeed, both wild type and AD mice spent more time in exploring the metal object, regardless of its novelty. Furthermore, the use of objects with higher affordance such as the cube was a confounding factor leading to "false" results that distorted ORT interpretation.

conclusionWhen designing exploration-based behavioral experiments aimed at assessing memory in healthy and AD mice, object characteristics should be carefully evaluated to improve scientific outcomes and minimize possible biases.

Indexed as

Object AttachmentAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalExploratory BehaviorFemaleMaleMiceVisual PerceptionAlzheimer’s miceexplorationobject preferenceobject recognition task

Identifiers

PMID34924388
PMCPMC8925114
OpenAlexW4200351332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.