Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34924175›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2022

Intraoperative prediction of postanaesthesia care unit hypotension.

Konstantina Palla, Stephanie L Hyland, Karen Posner, Pratik Ghosh, Bala Nair, Melissa Bristow, Yoana Paleva, Ben Williams, Christine Fong, Wil Van Cleve and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Trustworthy and ethical AI-enabled cardiovascular care: a rapid review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Artificial intelligence and anesthesia: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Konstantina PallaMicrosoft Research, Cambridge, UK.
Stephanie L HylandMicrosoft Research, Cambridge, UK.
Karen PosnerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Pratik GhoshMicrosoft Research, Cambridge, UK.
Bala NairDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Melissa BristowMicrosoft Research, Cambridge, UK.
Yoana PalevaMicrosoft Research, Cambridge, UK.
Ben WilliamsMicrosoft Research, Cambridge, UK.
Christine FongDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Wil Van CleveDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Dustin R LongDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ronald PauldineDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kenton O'HaraMicrosoft Research, Cambridge, UK.
Kenji TakedaMicrosoft Research, Cambridge, UK.
Monica S VavilalaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: vavilala@uw.edu.
Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine Training GrantT32GM086270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Tonya M Palermo · 2009 to 2026
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM086270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative hypotension is associated with adverse outcomes, but intraoperative prediction of postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) hypotension is not routine in anaesthesiology workflow. Although machine learning models may support clinician prediction of PACU hypotension, clinician acceptance of prediction models is poorly understood.

methodsWe developed a clinically informed gradient boosting machine learning model using preoperative and intraoperative data from 88 446 surgical patients from 2015 to 2019. Nine anaesthesiologists each made 192 predictions of PACU hypotension using a web-based visualisation tool with and without input from the machine learning model. Questionnaires and interviews were analysed using thematic content analysis for model acceptance by anaesthesiologists.

resultsThe model predicted PACU hypotension in 17 029 patients (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] 0.82 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.81-0.83] and average precision 0.40 [95% CI: 0.38-0.42]). On a random representative subset of 192 cases, anaesthesiologist performance improved from AUROC 0.67 (95% CI: 0.60-0.73) to AUROC 0.74 (95% CI: 0.68-0.79) with model predictions and information on risk factors. Anaesthesiologists perceived more value and expressed trust in the prediction model for prospective planning, informing PACU handoffs, and drawing attention to unexpected cases of PACU hypotension, but they doubted the model when predictions and associated features were not aligned with clinical judgement. Anaesthesiologists expressed interest in patient-specific thresholds for defining and treating postoperative hypotension.

conclusionsThe ability of anaesthesiologists to predict PACU hypotension was improved by exposure to machine learning model predictions. Clinicians acknowledged value and trust in machine learning technology. Increasing familiarity with clinical use of model predictions is needed for effective integration into perioperative workflows.

Indexed as

HypotensionPostoperative ComplicationsHumansMachine LearningProspective StudiesROC Curvedata sciencehypotensionmachine learningpostanaesthesia care unitrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID34924175
PMCPMC9074793
OpenAlexW4200623843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.