Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34924027›Full record

ArticleNeurological research and practice2021

DIPS (Dystonia Image-based Programming of Stimulation: a prospective, randomized, double-blind crossover trial).

Florian Lange, Jonas Roothans, Tim Wichmann, Götz Gelbrich, Christoph Röser, Jens Volkmann, Martin Reich

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05097001 (Dystonia Image-based Programming of Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05097001 narecruitingnot on this map

Dystonia Image-based Programming of Stimulation: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Crossover Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWuerzburg University HospitalRan2021 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsDystonia, Deep Brain StimulationArmsDBS programming
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Florian LangeDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital and Julius Maximilian University, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. Lange_L@ukw.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8497-7780
Jonas RoothansDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital and Julius Maximilian University, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Tim WichmannDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital and Julius Maximilian University, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Götz GelbrichInstitute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry (ICE-B) at the University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 2, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Christoph RöserClinical Trial Center (CTC) at the University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 2, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Jens VolkmannDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital and Julius Maximilian University, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Martin ReichDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital and Julius Maximilian University, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
University of Würzburg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01KG2032_DIPSDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 424778381Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Klinische Forschung, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg Z-2/83
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDeep brain stimulation of the internal globus pallidus is an effective treatment for dystonia. However, there is a large variability in clinical outcome with up to 25% non-responders even in highly selected primary dystonia patients. In a large cohort of patients we recently demonstrated that the variable clinical outcomes of pallidal DBS for dystonia may result to a large degree by the exact location and stimulation volume within the pallidal region. Here we test a novel approach of programing based on these insights: we first defined probabilistic maps of anti-dystonic effects by aggregating individual electrode locations and volumes of tissue activated of > 80 patients collected in a multicentre effort. We subsequently modified the algorithms to be able to test all possible stimulation settings of de novo patients in silico based on the expected clinical outcome and thus potentially predict the best possible stimulation parameters for the individual patients.

methodsWithin the framework of a BMBF-funded study, this concept of a computer-based prediction of optimal stimulation parameters for patients with dystonia will be tested in a randomized, controlled crossover study. The main parameter for clinical efficacy and primary endpoint is based on the blinded physician rating of dystonia severity reflected by Clinical Dystonia Rating Scales for both interventions (best clinical settings and model predicted settings) after 4 weeks of continuous stimulation. The primary endpoint is defined as "successful treatment with model predicted settings" (yes or no). The value is "yes" if the motor symptoms with model predicted settings are equal or better (tolerance 5% of absolute difference in percentages) to clinical settings. Secondary endpoints will include measures of quality of life, calculated energy consumption of the neurostimulation system and physician time for programming. PERSPECTIVE: We envision, that computer-guided deep brain stimulation programming in silico might provide optimal stimulation settings for patients with dystonia without the burden of months of programming sessions. The study protocol is designed to evaluate which programming method is more effective in controlling motor symptom severity and improving quality of life in dystonia (best clinical settings and model predicted settings). Trial registration Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on Oct 27, 2021 (NCT05097001).

Indexed as

Deep brain stimulationDystoniaImaging-guided DBS programming

Identifiers

PMID34924027
PMCPMC8686267
OpenAlexW4200098436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.