Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34923993›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2021

Characterizing children's eating patterns: does the choice of eating occasion definition matter?

Rebecca M Leech, Alison C Spence, Kathleen E Lacy, Miaobing Zheng, Anna Timperio, Sarah A McNaughton

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Consumption and Breakfast Patterns in Children and Adolescents with Congenital Heart Disease.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Correction: Characterizing children's eating patterns: does the choice of eating occasion definition matter?The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca M LeechInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia. rebecca.leech@deakin.edu.au.
Alison C SpenceInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Kathleen E LacyInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Miaobing ZhengInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Anna TimperioInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Sarah A McNaughtonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Deakin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecommendations to define eating occasions (EO) currently exist for research in adults, but not for children or adolescents. We examined how varying EO definitions affect the characterization of eating patterns in children and adolescents.

methodsCross-sectional dietary data collected using a 24-h recall data during the 2011-12 Australian National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (1364 boys and 1337 girls aged 2-18 years) were analyzed. Eight definitions were applied: participant-identified, time-of-day, and 6 neutral definitions (EO separated by 15- or 60-min and/or an additional energy criterion of 21 or 210 kJ). Frequency of and total energy intake from meals, snacks, and all EO were estimated. F tests stratified by gender and age-group, were used to assess differences between definitions. Agreement between definitions of meal and snack frequencies was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Linear regression was used to estimate the proportion of variance in total energy intake (kJ) and BMI z-score predicted by each definition.

resultsMean frequencies of meals and snacks differed between the participant-identified and time-of-day definitions, in boys and girls and for all age groups (P < 0.01). Across the six neutral definitions, there were differences between mean frequencies of EO with the largest mean difference observed for children aged 2-3 y (boys: 2.3, girls: 2.5; P < 0.003). Between the participant-identified and time-of-day definitions, there was good agreement for frequencies of snacks (ICC for both genders: 0.93) but not meals (boys: 0.36; girls: 0.38). The 15-min time interval plus 210 kJ definition of an EO consistently predicted the most variance in total energy intake (R

conclusionsHow eating patterns are characterized vary depending on the EO definitions employed, particularly in young children. Variance in total energy intake was best predicted by a variation of the neutral definition whereas definitions that delineated meals and snacks performed better in relation to predicting BMI variance. Further international research that compares EO definitions in children will help inform a standard approach.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorSnacksAdolescentAdultAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDietEatingEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansMaleMealsBMIChildrenEating occasionsEating patternsMeal frequencySnack frequency

Identifiers

PMID34923993
PMCPMC8684678
OpenAlexW4200426579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.