ArticleBMC medicine2021
Assessment of anti-PD-(L)1 for patients with coexisting malignant tumor and tuberculosis classified by active, latent, and obsolete stage.
Article in BMC medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Temporal Disease Sequence and Prognostic Outcomes in Patients with Coexisting Lung Cancer and Tuberculosis: A 123-Patient Retrospective Cohort Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with Active Tuberculosis Disease in Patients with Lung Cancer Following Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Case Reports.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Coexisting Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Coexisting Lung Cancer and Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Comprehensive Review From Incidence to Management.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Impact of Latent Tuberculosis Infection and T-SPOT.TB Dynamics Alterations on Prognosis in Advanced NSCLC Treated With ICIs--IPTW-Based Retrospective Study.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2025Article
- Distinguish active tuberculosis with an immune-related signature and molecule subtypes: a multi-cohort analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Safety of nivolumab monotherapy in five cancer types: pooled analysis of post-marketing surveillance in Japan.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma coexisting with tuberculosis: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Sintilimab Combined with Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel-Based Chemotherapy in Severe Locally Advanced or Metastatic Squamous NSCLC Showed Good Efficacy and Safety: A Pilot Retrospective Analysis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is not a rare clinical scenario to have patients presenting with coexisting malignant tumor and tuberculosis. Whether it is feasible to conduct programmed death-(ligand) 1 [PD-(L)1] inhibitors to these patients, especially those with active tuberculosis treated with concurrent anti-tuberculosis, is still unknown.
methodsThis study enrolled patients with coexisting malignancy and tuberculosis and treated with anti-PD-(L)1 from Jan 2018 to July 2021 in 2 institutions. The progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy, as well as response to anti-tuberculosis treatment, were evaluated.
resultsA total of 98 patients were screened from this cohort study, with 45 (45.9%), 21 (21.4%), and 32 (32.7%) patients diagnosed with active, latent, and obsolete tuberculosis, respectively. The overall ORR was 36.0% for anti-PD-(L)1 therapy, with 34.2%, 35.5%, and 41.2% for each subgroup. Median PFS was 8.0 vs 6.0 vs 6.0 months (P=0.685) for each subgroup at the time of this analysis. For patients with active tuberculosis treated with concurrent anti-tuberculosis, median duration of anti-tuberculosis therapy was 10.0 (95% CI, 8.01-11.99) months. There were 83.3% (20/24) and 93.3% (42/45) patients showing sputum conversion and radiographic response, respectively, after anti-tuberculosis therapy, and two patients experienced tuberculosis relapse. Notably, none of the patients in latent and only one patient in obsolete subgroups showed tuberculosis induction or relapse after anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 33 patients (73.3%) when treated with concurrent anti-PD-(L)1 and anti-tuberculosis. Grade 3 or higher TRAEs were hematotoxicity (n = 5, 11.1%), and one patient suffered grade 3 pneumonitis leading to the discontinuation of immunotherapy.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that patients with coexisting malignant tumor and tuberculosis benefited equally from anti-PD-(L)1 therapy, and anti-tuberculosis response was unimpaired for those with active tuberculosis. Notably, the combination of anti-PD-(L)1 and anti-tuberculosis therapy was well-tolerated without significant unexpected toxic effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.