Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34923964›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Aging through the time of COVID-19: a survey of self-reported healthcare access.

Allie Peckham, Keenan A Pituch, Molly Maxfield, M Aaron Guest, Shalini Sivanandam, Bradley N Doebbeling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Allie PeckhamCenter for Innovation in Healthy and Resilient Aging, Arizona State University, 550 North 3rd St, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA. Allie.peckham@asu.edu.
Keenan A PituchEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 550 North 3rd St, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
Molly MaxfieldCenter for Innovation in Healthy and Resilient Aging, Arizona State University, 550 North 3rd St, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
M Aaron GuestCenter for Innovation in Healthy and Resilient Aging, Arizona State University, 550 North 3rd St, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
Shalini SivanandamCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 500 North 3rd St, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
Bradley N DoebbelingCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 500 North 3rd St, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic conditions are common and require ongoing continuous management and preventive measures. The COVID-19 pandemic may have affected the management of chronic conditions by delaying care. We sought to understand the impact of personal characteristics (i.e., age) and healthcare factors (i.e., access to a provider) on healthcare access in a sample of Americans 50 years of age or older during COVID-19.

methodParticipants completed an online survey at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic - the Aging in the Time of COVID Survey. Questions focused on health status, health care access, COVID-19 fear, and social connectedness. Participants were recruited through social media advertisements, list serves, and snowball sampling. Data collection started in early April 2020 and concluded in late May 2020. Logistic regression models examined the results of two key access points: healthcare provider/doctor (n = 481) and medication (n = 765), with 56 and 93% of participants reporting access to a provider and medications, respectively.

resultsIndividuals with an established primary care provider were much more likely to obtain access to a healthcare provider, OR = 3.81 (95% CI: 1.69, 8.77), and to receive medication, OR = 4.48 (95% CI: 1.61, 11.48), during the time of COVID-19. In addition, access to medication was (a) higher for those who were older, OR = 1.05 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.09), had a higher income (greater than 100 k compared to less than 50 k, OR = 3.04 (95% CI: 1.11, 8.98), and (b) lower for those having caregiving responsibilities, OR = 0.41 (95% CI: 0.21, 0.78), or greater social isolation, OR = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.98).

conclusionsAlthough most participants had access to medication, just over half had access to a healthcare provider when needed. Notably, health-seeking behaviors for individuals who do not have an established primary care providers as well as those who provide unpaid care, are socially isolated, and younger may require more proactive approaches to care monitoring, management, and maintenance.

Indexed as

COVID-19AgingHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Self ReportBarriersChronic conditionsCOVID-19Healthcare accessOlder adultsPandemic

Identifiers

PMID34923964
PMCPMC8684589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.