ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2022
[Fracture-related infections after intramedullary nailing : Diagnostics and treatment].
Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Medical imaging diagnosis of orthopedic prosthesis-associated infections: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Review
- Long-Term Outcomes Following Single-Stage Reamed Intramedullary Exchange Nailing in Apparently Aseptic Femoral Shaft Nonunion with Unsuspected Proof of Bacteria.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- [Diagnostic and therapeutic work-up of infected tibial nonunion].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Fracture-Related Infection-Epidemiology, Etiology, Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024Review
- [Infected nonunion: diagnostic and therapeutic work-up].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- What Is the Most Effective Empirical Antibiotic Treatment for Early, Delayed, and Late Fracture-Related Infections?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intramedullary nailing is the treatment of choice for a large number of fractures requiring surgery. In cases of fracture-related infections (FRI) the treatment of nail infections requires special attention due to the closed situation of the osteosynthesis material in the intramedullary canal. This article gives an overview of the general principles and diagnostic criteria for FRI after nail fixation and discusses the treatment recommendations based on three case examples. In cases of acute implant infections, an implant-retaining procedure is principally possible for both periprosthetic joint infections and FRI; however, after intramedullary nailing the nail should also be exchanged in cases of acute nail infections as a sufficient debridement of the nail is impossible due to its intramedullary location. In chronic FRI after intramedullary nailing a one-stage or two-stage procedure can be followed. In cases of adequate soft tissue coverage, good fracture reduction and an expected bone healing without critical bony substance defects, a one-stage procedure with nail exchange should be preferred. If a chronic infection with soft tissue and bone defects develops after intramedullary nailing, a two-stage procedure analogous to the treatment of osteomyelitis should be considered. In this case a multidisciplinary team approach with specialists in plastic surgery, microbiology and infectious diseases is necessary. The use of local antibiotics and antimicrobial-coated implants is deemed to be advantageous.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.