ReviewPediatric research2022
Choiceless options: when hospital-based services represent the only palliative care offering.
Review in Pediatric research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Place of Death of People With Chronic Conditions in Latin America: A Systematic Review.Public health reviews · 2026Pooled it
- A call for equity-informed pediatric palliative care in Canada.Paediatrics & child health · 2026Article
- Describing Deaths over a Decade: The Final Week of Life Among Hospitalized Children with Cancer.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prevalence, trends, and specialized palliative care utilization in Taiwanese children and young adults with life-limiting conditions between 2008 and 2017: a nationwide population-based study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lack of availability of community-based pediatric palliative care and home-based hospice services for children limits care location options for families. For many families from rural regions, hospital-based care models may be perceived as the only viable choice due to geographic gaps in service coverage. Gaps exist not only in access to these key services but also in service quality without national pediatric service standards. While families from rural regions may express a goal to be home with their child for relational and communal care purposes the current setting of services may limit the feasibility of home-based care. Several potential pediatric systems changes (workforce, finance, policy) have the capacity to create and sustain a care model that allows a child with complex, chronic, or life-limiting diagnoses to experience a home other than the hospital. The existence of community-based pediatric palliative and pediatric home-based hospice services with a sustained workforce and high-quality national standard for children would bolster the ultimate congruence of a family's preference with actual care choices. IMPACT: Families of children with life-limiting diagnoses may express a preference to be home together. Disparities in access to community-based pediatric palliative care and hospice exist for children, particularly in rural regions. These gaps may translate into families experiencing hospital-based settings as the only feasible care model which may result in care escalations and medicalization. Expansion of the community-based workforce and development of pediatric-specific standards for key palliative services would increase home-based care options for families. This paper acknowledges the pediatric palliative and hospice availability crisis in rural regions and urges for improved access to high-quality, community-based services for children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34923578What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.