Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34923449›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2022

Resuming elective surgery after COVID-19: A simulation modelling framework for guiding the phased opening of operating rooms.

Hairil Rizal Abdullah, Sean Shao Wei Lam, Boon Yew Ang, Ahmadreza Pourghaderi, Francis Ngoc Hoang Long Nguyen, David Bruce Matchar, Hiang Khoon Tan, Marcus Eng Hock Ong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The impact of elective surgery postponement during COVID-19 on emergency bellwether procedures in a large tertiary centre in Singapore.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hairil Rizal AbdullahHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Health Services Research Centre, Singapore Health Services, Singapore; Health Services Research Institute, SingHealth Duke NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore; Department of Anesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. Electronic address: hairil.rizal.abdullah@singhealth.com.sg.
Sean Shao Wei LamHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Health Services Research Centre, Singapore Health Services, Singapore; Health Services Research Institute, SingHealth Duke NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University, Singapore; SingHealth Duke-NUS Global Health Institute, Singapore Health Services, Singapore. Electronic address: lam.shao.wei@singhealth.com.sg.
Boon Yew AngHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Health Services Research Centre, Singapore Health Services, Singapore; Health Services Research Institute, SingHealth Duke NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore. Electronic address: ang.boon.yew@singhealth.com.sg.
Ahmadreza PourghaderiHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Health Services Research Centre, Singapore Health Services, Singapore; Health Services Research Institute, SingHealth Duke NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore. Electronic address: ahmadreza.pourghaderi@singhealth.com.sg.
Francis Ngoc Hoang Long NguyenHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Health Services Research Centre, Singapore Health Services, Singapore; Health Services Research Institute, SingHealth Duke NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore. Electronic address: nguyen.ngoc.hoang.long@singhealth.com.sg.
David Bruce MatcharHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Health Services Research Centre, Singapore Health Services, Singapore; Health Services Research Institute, SingHealth Duke NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore; Department of Internal Medicine, Duke University, United States; Duke Centre of Clinical Health Policy Research, Duke University, United States. Electronic address: david.matchar@duke-nus.edu.sg.
Hiang Khoon TanSurgery Academic Program, SingHealth Duke NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore; Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; SingHealth Duke-NUS Global Health Institute, Singapore Health Services, Singapore. Electronic address: tan.hiang.khoon@singhealth.com.sg.
Marcus Eng Hock OngHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Health Services Research Centre, Singapore Health Services, Singapore; Health Services Research Institute, SingHealth Duke NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore; Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. Electronic address: marcus.ong.e.h@singhealth.com.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a 2-stage discrete events simulation (DES) based framework for the evaluation of elective surgery cancellation strategies and resumption scenarios across multiple operational outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsStudy data was derived from the data warehouse and domain knowledge on the operational process of the largest tertiary hospital in Singapore. 34,025 unique cases over 43 operating rooms (ORs) and 18 surgical disciplines performed from 1 January 2019 to 31 May 2020 were extracted for the study. A clustering approach was used in stage 1 of the modelling framework to develop the groups of surgeries that followed distinctive postponement patterns. These clusters were then used as inputs for stage 2 where the DES model was used to evaluate alternative phased resumption strategies considering the outcomes of OR utilization, waiting times to surgeries and the time to clear the backlogs.

resultsThe tool enabled us to understand the elective postponement patterns during the COVID-19 partial lockdown period, and evaluate the best phased resumption strategy. Differences in the performance measures were evaluated based on 95% confidence intervals. The results indicate that two of the gradual phased resumption strategies provided lower peak OR and bed utilizations but required a longer time to return to BAU levels. Minimum peak bed demands could also be reduced by approximately 14 beds daily with the gradual resumption strategy, whilst the maximum peak bed demands by approximately 8.2 beds. Peak OR utilization could be reduced to 92% for gradual resumption as compared to a minimum peak of 94.2% with the full resumption strategy.

conclusionsThe 2-stage modelling framework coupled with a user-friendly visualization interface were key enablers for understanding the elective surgery postponement patterns during a partial lockdown phase. The DES model enabled the identification and evaluation of optimal phased resumption policies across multiple important operational outcome measures. LAY ABSTRACT: During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, most healthcare systems suspended their non-urgent elective surgery services. This strategy was undertaken as a means to expand surge capacity, through the preservation of structural resources (such as operating theaters, ICU beds, and ventilators), consumables (such as personal protective equipment and medications), and critical healthcare manpower. As a result, some patients had less-essential surgeries postponed due to the pandemic. As the first wave of the pandemic waned, there was an urgent need to quickly develop optimal strategies for the resumption of these surgeries. We developed a 2-stage discrete events simulation (DES) framework based on 34,025 unique cases over 43 operating rooms (ORs) and 18 surgical disciplines performed from 1 January 2019 to 31 May 2020 captured in the Singapore General Hospital (SGH) enterprise data warehouse. The outcomes evaluated were OR utilization, waiting times to surgeries and time to clear the backlogs. A user-friendly visualization interface was developed to enable decision makers to determine the most promising surgery resumption strategy across these outcomes. Hospitals globally can make use of the modelling framework to adapt to their own surgical systems to evaluate strategies for postponement and resumption of elective surgeries.

Indexed as

Agile resource planningCOVID-19Discrete events simulationHealthcare resource allocationOR resource management

Identifiers

PMID34923449
PMCPMC8674476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.