Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34923317›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies2022

Nurse practitioners' perception of temporary full practice authority during a COVID-19 surge: A qualitative study.

Monica O'Reilly-Jacob, Jennifer Perloff, Roya Sherafat-Kazemzadeh, Jane Flanagan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Problems and Suggested Solutions of Advanced Practice Nursing in Disaster Events].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Nurses' Perceptions of Ethical Conflicts When Caring for Patients with COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Nurse Practitioners Navigating the Consequences of Directives, Policies, and Recommendations Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Long-Term Care Homes.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monica O'Reilly-JacobBoston College, Connell School of Nursing, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA. Electronic address: monica.oreilly@bc.edu.
Jennifer PerloffBrandeis University, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA.
Roya Sherafat-KazemzadehBrandeis University, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA.
Jane FlanaganBoston College, Connell School of Nursing, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA.
Boston College · USBrandeis University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, 22 state governors temporarily waived physician supervision of nurse practitioners to expand access to health care during the state of emergency.

objectiveWe examined the nurse practitioner perception of the simultaneous scope of practice changes and the exigent pandemic demands during the initial COVID-19 surge in Massachusetts.

methodsQualitative descriptive design using content analysis of open-ended responses to a web-based survey of Massachusetts nurse practitioners conducted in May & June 2020.

resultsSurvey response rate was 40.6 percent (N = 389). Content analysis identified four themes including: 1) State waivers enabled more control over practice and more expedited care, 2) State waiver did not change practice either because of pre-established independence or employers not changing policy, 3) Perception of nurse practitioner role as both versatile and disposable and 4) Telehealth increased access to care and created an autonomous setting.

conclusionsAlthough findings suggest fewer barriers in some areas, the temporary removal of state-level restrictions alone is not sufficient to achieve immediate full scope of practice for nurse practitioners. There is a need for regulatory frameworks that optimize the capacity of the advanced practice nursing workforce to respond to global health emergencies. US-based policymakers and healthcare organizations should revise outdated scope of practice policies and capitalize on telehealth technology to utilize the full extent of nurse practitioners. Likewise, nursing leaders should be a voice for nurse practitioners to more effectively and safely maximize the nurse practitioner contribution during emergency responses. In countries where the role is under development, regulators can leverage these findings to establish modernized nurse practitioner scope of practice policies from the outset.

Indexed as

COVID-19Nurse PractitionersHumansNurse's RolePandemicsPerceptionSARS-CoV-2United StatesAdvanced practice nurseCOVID-19Nurse practitionerRegulationScope of practiceSurvey

Identifiers

PMID34923317
PMCPMC8609748
OpenAlexW3214822474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.