ArticleMutation research
Characterization and implementation of a miniature X-ray system for live cell microscopy.
Article in Mutation research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DNA damage reduces heterogeneity and coherence of chromatin motions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study of radiation effects on biological tissues is a diverse field of research with direct applications to improve human health, in particular in the contexts of radiation therapy and space exploration. Understanding the DNA damage response following radiation exposure, which is a key determinant for mutagenesis, requires reproducible methods for delivering known doses of ionizing radiation (IR) in a controlled environment. Multiple IR sources, including research X-ray and gamma-ray irradiators are routinely used in basic and translational research with cell and animal models. These systems are however not ideal when a high temporal resolution is needed, for example to study early DNA damage responses with live cell microscopy. Here, we characterize the dose rate and beam properties of a commercial, miniature, affordable, and versatile X-ray source (Mini-X). We describe how to use Mini-X on the stage of a fluorescence microscope to deliver high IR dose rates (up to 29 Gy/min) or lower dose rates (≤ 0.1 Gy/min) in live cell imaging experiments. This article provides a blueprint for radiation biology applications with high temporal resolution, with a step-by-step guide to implement a miniature X-ray system on an imaging platform, and the information needed to characterize the system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.