Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34922598›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2021

Identification of muscle weakness in older adults from normalized upper and lower limbs strength: a cross-sectional study.

Pedro Pugliesi Abdalla, Lucimere Bohn, Leonardo Santos Lopes da Silva, André Pereira Dos Santos, Marcio Fernando Tasinafo Junior, Ana Claudia Rossini Venturini, Anderson Dos Santos Carvalho, David Martinez Gomez, Jorge Mota, Dalmo Roberto Lopes Machado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pedro Pugliesi AbdallaCollege of Nursing at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. pedroabdalla11@gmail.com.
Lucimere BohnFaculty of Sports, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Leonardo Santos Lopes da SilvaSchool of Physical Education and Sport of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
André Pereira Dos SantosCollege of Nursing at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Marcio Fernando Tasinafo JuniorSchool of Physical Education and Sport of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Ana Claudia Rossini VenturiniCollege of Nursing at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Anderson Dos Santos CarvalhoPhysical Education Course, Paulista University, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.
David Martinez GomezSchool of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jorge MotaFaculty of Sports, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Dalmo Roberto Lopes MachadoCollege of Nursing at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo propose cut-off points for older adults' weakness for upper and lower limbs muscle strength normalized by body size with the ratio standard/muscle quality and allometric scaling.

methodsNinety-four community-dwelling older adults (69.1% women) were assessed for 49 body-size variables (anthropometry, body composition and body indexes), handgrip strength (HGS), one maximum repetition measurement for knee extensors (1RM), isokinetic knee extension peak torque at 60°/s (PT), and six-minute walk test (6MWT). Ratio standard or muscle quality (muscle strength/body size) and allometric scaling (muscle strength/body size

resultsAbsolute HGS, 1RM and PT cut-off points were not adequate because they were associated with body size (r > 0.30). But it was corrected with muscle strength normalization according to body size-variables: HGS (n = 1); 1RM (n = 24) and PT (n = 24). The best cut-off points, with the highest area under the curve (AUC), were found after normalization for men: HGS/forearm circumference (1.33 kg/cm, AUC = 0.74), 1RM/triceps skinfold (4.22 kg/mm, AUC = 0.81), and PT/body mass*height

conclusionsUpper and lower limbs muscle weakness cut-off points standardized according to body size were proposed for older adults of both sexes. Normalization removes the effect of extreme body size on muscle strength (both sexes) and improves the accuracy to identify weakness at population level (for women, but not in men), reducing the risk of false-negative/positive cases.

Indexed as

Allometrically scaledDisabilityEvaluationFrailtyFunction/functional statusMeasurementSarcopeniaScaling

Identifiers

PMID34922598
PMCPMC8684151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.