Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34922549›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2021

Direct phone communication to primary care physician to plan discharge from hospital: feasibility and benefits.

Lukas Enzinger, Perrine Dumanoir, Bastien Boussat, Pascal Couturier, Patrice Francois

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Response to LTE "Bridging the Gap Between Patient Experience and System-Level Review: A Call for Discipline-Specific Communication in Hospital-to-Home Transitions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lukas EnzingerService Universitaire de Gériatrie et Gérontologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France. lenzinger@chu-grenoble.fr.
Perrine DumanoirDépartement Universitaire de Médecine Interne, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Bastien BoussatService d'épidémiologie et évaluation médicale, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Pascal CouturierService Universitaire de Gériatrie et Gérontologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Patrice FrancoisService d'épidémiologie et évaluation médicale, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe discharge summary is the main vector of communication at the time of hospital discharge, but it is known to be insufficient. Direct phone contact between hospitalist and primary care physician (PCP) at discharge could ensure rapid transmission of information, improve patient safety and promote interprofessional collaboration. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and benefit of a phone call from hospitalist to PCP to plan discharge.

methodsThis study was a prospective, single-center, cross-sectional observational study. It took place in an acute medicine unit of a French university hospital. The hospitalist had to contact the PCP by telephone within 72 h prior discharge, making a maximum of 3 call attempts. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients whose primary care physician could be reached by telephone at the time of discharge. The other criteria were the physicians' opinions on the benefits of this contact and its effect on readmission rates.

results275 patients were eligible. 8 hospitalists and 130 PCPs gave their opinion. Calls attempts were made for 71% of eligible patients. Call attempts resulted in successful contact with the PCP 157 times, representing 80% of call attempts and 57% of eligible patients. The average call completion rate was 47%. The telephone contact was perceived by hospitalist as useful and providing security. The PCPs were satisfied and wanted this intervention to become systematic. Telephone contact did not reduce the readmission rate.

conclusionsDespite the implementation of a standardized process, the feasibility of the intervention was modest. The main obstacle was hospitalists lacking time and facing difficulties in reaching the PCPs. However, physicians showed desire to communicate directly by telephone at the time of discharge.

trial registrationFrench C.N.I.L. registration number 2108852. Registration date October 12, 2017.

Indexed as

Physicians, Primary CareCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesHospitalsHumansPatient DischargeProspective StudiesTelephoneCommunicationHospitalistsInterprofessional relationsPatient dischargePrimary care physiciansTelephone

Identifiers

PMID34922549
PMCPMC8684651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.