Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34922515›Full record

Observational studyBMC pulmonary medicine2021

Real-world study in severe eosinophilic asthma patients refractory to anti-IL5 biological agents treated with benralizumab in Spain (ORBE study).

Eva Martínez-Moragón, Ismael García-Moguel, Javier Nuevo, Gustavo Resler, ORBE study investigators

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Modifying the course of asthma: mechanisms and strategies for clinical remission.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Switching Biological Therapies in Severe Asthma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eva Martínez-MoragónPneumology Service, University Hospital Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain. evamartinezmoragon@gmail.com.
Ismael García-MoguelSevere Asthma Unit, Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Javier NuevoAstraZeneca Farmacéutica Spain S.A., Madrid, Spain.
Gustavo ReslerAstraZeneca Farmacéutica Spain S.A., Madrid, Spain.
ORBE study investigators
Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital Universitario Doctor Peset · ESAstraZeneca (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBenralizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the human interleukin-5 (IL-5) receptor (IL-5R), was used before marketing authorisation in Spain in a real world setting as part of an early-access programme (EAP) to treat patients with severe eosinophilic asthma with prior insufficient response or intolerance to anti-IL5 treatment (mepolizumab or reslizumab). The objective of this study is to describe the patient profile candidate for treatment and to assess benralizumab effectiveness.

methodsThis is an observational, retrospective, multicentre study in severe eosinophilic asthma patients refractory to other biological agents targeting the IL-5 pathway. Baseline characteristics included closest data, from the previous 12 months, to benralizumab treatment onset (index date). Patients were followed until the last treatment dosage while EAP was active (March to December 2018). Effectiveness was evaluated versus baseline, in patients who received at least three doses, with asthma control test (ACT), Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ), annual severe exacerbation rate, oral corticosteroids treatment (OCS) and asthma-related healthcare resources utilization.

resultsTwenty-seven patients treated with benralizumab were included in the analysis. Effectiveness was assessed in 19 patients. Both questionnaires showed clinically meaningful differences, i.e. ACT score ≥ 3 and MiniAQLQ score ≥ 0.5, compared with baseline [mean (SD), 3.3 (6.8) and 1.2 (1.9), respectively]. Patients treated with OCS decreased during follow-up from 88.9% (n = 24/27) at baseline to 78.9% (n = 15/19) and 31.6% (n = 6/19) had an OCS dose reduction ≥ 50%. The difference in annual severe exacerbation rate during follow-up showed a significant reduction vs. baseline (2.12 per patient-year, 95% CI 0.99-3.24, p = 0.002). The differences in annual rate of non-scheduled primary care and specialist visits during follow-up indicated a significant decrease [2.28 per patient-year (95% CI 1.55-3.01; p < 0.001) and 1.47 per patient-year (95% CI 0.65-2.30; p = 0.004), respectively], as well as the difference in annual rate of number of emergency department visits [1.18 per patient-year (95% CI 0.51-1.85; p = 0.007)].

conclusionsThese results suggest that severe eosinophilic asthma patients receiving benralizumab, presented clinically meaningful improvement in asthma control and asthma-related QoL as well as OCS dose reduction. Results also aim to significant reductions in annual severe exacerbation rates, non-scheduled primary care and specialist visits, and emergency department visits rates.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAgedAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAsthmaFemaleHumansInterleukin-5MaleMiddle AgedPulmonary EosinophiliaRetrospective StudiesSpainSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedbenralizumabInterleukin-5AsthmaBenralizumabBiological treatmentEarly access programmeEosinophilic asthmaSevere asthma

Identifiers

PMID34922515
PMCPMC8684207
OpenAlexW4200182448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.