Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34922506›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2021

A scoping review of the perceptions of death in the context of organ donation and transplantation.

George Skowronski, Anil Ramnani, Dianne Walton-Sonda, Cynthia Forlini, Michael J O'Leary, Lisa O'Reilly, Linda Sheahan, Cameron Stewart, Ian Kerridge

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nurses' attitudes and knowledge about organ donation and transplantation in closed hospital wards.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ten Steps Toward Improving In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Quality of Care and Outcomes.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

George SkowronskiSydney Health Ethics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. mavidica1@gmail.com.
Anil RamnaniCanberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia.
Dianne Walton-SondaACT Health Library, Canberra, Australia.
Cynthia ForliniSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Michael J O'LearyRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Lisa O'ReillySouth East Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Linda SheahanSydney Health Ethics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Cameron StewartLaw School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Ian KerridgeSydney Health Ethics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
University of Sydney · AUAct Health · AUCanberra Hospital · AUDeakin University · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUSydney Local Health District · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocio-cultural perceptions surrounding death have profoundly changed since the 1950s with development of modern intensive care and progress in solid organ transplantation. Despite broad support for organ transplantation, many fundamental concepts and practices including brain death, organ donation after circulatory death, and some antemortem interventions to prepare for transplantation continue to be challenged. Attitudes toward the ethical issues surrounding death and organ donation may influence support for and participation in organ donation but differences between and among diverse populations have not been studied.

objectivesIn order to clarify attitudes toward brain death, organ donation after circulatory death and antemortem interventions in the context of organ donation, we conducted a scoping review of international English-language quantitative surveys in various populations. STUDY APPRAISAL: A search of literature up to October 2020 was performed, using multiple databases. After screening, 45 studies were found to meet pre-specified inclusion criteria.

results32 studies examined attitudes to brain death, predominantly in healthcare professionals. In most, around 75% of respondents accepted brain death as equivalent to death of the person. Less common perspectives included equating death with irreversible coma and willingness to undertake organ donation even if it caused death. 14 studies examined attitudes to organ donation following circulatory death. Around half of respondents in most studies accepted that death could be confidently diagnosed after only 5 min of cardiorespiratory arrest. The predominant reason was lack of confidence in doctors or diagnostic procedures. Only 6 studies examined attitudes towards antemortem interventions in prospective organ donors. Most respondents supported minimally invasive procedures and only where specific consent was obtained.

conclusionsOur review suggests a considerable proportion of people, including healthcare professionals, have doubts about the medical and ethical validity of modern determinations of death. The prognosis of brain injury was a more common concern in the context of organ donation decision-making than certainty of death.

Indexed as

Organ TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementBrain DeathHumansProspective StudiesTissue Donors

Identifiers

PMID34922506
PMCPMC8684159
OpenAlexW4200626169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.