ArticleBMC medical ethics2021
A scoping review of the perceptions of death in the context of organ donation and transplantation.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Barriers to conversations about deceased organ donation among adults living in the UK: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.BMJ open · 2025Pooled it
- Neurocritical Care Experience and Attitudes Related to Organ Donation in the USA.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Association of reduced physician requirements with brain death confirmation pathway duration and organ donation outcomes in the ICU: a retrospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Factors that create trust in the donation after circulatory death process among surgical personnel: a qualitative descriptive study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Establishing standards for controlled donation after circulatory determination of death in adults: the Bucharest international European Society for Organ Transplantation consensus.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
- Family refusal rates for organ donation after brain death and after circulatory death: a single-center 6-year experience.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Article
- Nurses' attitudes and knowledge about organ donation and transplantation in closed hospital wards.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025Article
- Conscience clause in brain death care: ethical and legal perspectives of young nurses and midwives in Poland.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Brain Death Knowledge and Attitudes Among Fourth-Year Medical Students at Umm Al-Qura University.Cureus · 2024Article
- Critical care specialists, the missing link in organ procurement for transplantation.World journal of critical care medicine · 2024Article
- Ten Steps Toward Improving In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Quality of Care and Outcomes.Resuscitation · 2023Article
- Ten Steps Toward Improving In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Quality of Care and Outcomes.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2023Review
- Opinion of surveyed nurses on transplantation and reasons for negative public attitudes toward organ donation.Frontiers in transplantation · 2023Article
- A machine-learning approach to estimating public intentions to become a living kidney donor in England: Evidence from repeated cross-sectional survey data.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocio-cultural perceptions surrounding death have profoundly changed since the 1950s with development of modern intensive care and progress in solid organ transplantation. Despite broad support for organ transplantation, many fundamental concepts and practices including brain death, organ donation after circulatory death, and some antemortem interventions to prepare for transplantation continue to be challenged. Attitudes toward the ethical issues surrounding death and organ donation may influence support for and participation in organ donation but differences between and among diverse populations have not been studied.
objectivesIn order to clarify attitudes toward brain death, organ donation after circulatory death and antemortem interventions in the context of organ donation, we conducted a scoping review of international English-language quantitative surveys in various populations. STUDY APPRAISAL: A search of literature up to October 2020 was performed, using multiple databases. After screening, 45 studies were found to meet pre-specified inclusion criteria.
results32 studies examined attitudes to brain death, predominantly in healthcare professionals. In most, around 75% of respondents accepted brain death as equivalent to death of the person. Less common perspectives included equating death with irreversible coma and willingness to undertake organ donation even if it caused death. 14 studies examined attitudes to organ donation following circulatory death. Around half of respondents in most studies accepted that death could be confidently diagnosed after only 5 min of cardiorespiratory arrest. The predominant reason was lack of confidence in doctors or diagnostic procedures. Only 6 studies examined attitudes towards antemortem interventions in prospective organ donors. Most respondents supported minimally invasive procedures and only where specific consent was obtained.
conclusionsOur review suggests a considerable proportion of people, including healthcare professionals, have doubts about the medical and ethical validity of modern determinations of death. The prognosis of brain injury was a more common concern in the context of organ donation decision-making than certainty of death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.