Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34922466›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Web-based software applications for frailty assessment in older adults: a scoping review of current status with insights into future development.

Riley Chang, Hilary Low, Andrew McDonald, Grace Park, Xiaowei Song

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. FI-CGA and eFI-CGA in Frailty Care: a Scoping Review.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Feasibility of implementing a telephone-based frailty assessment.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022
    Article
  15. Editorial: Covid-19 and Virtual Geriatric Care.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Riley ChangClinical Research, Surrey Memorial Hospital, Fraser Health, Critical Care Tower T2-820, 13750 96th Avenue, Surrey, BC, V3V 1Z2, Canada.
Hilary LowClinical Research, Surrey Memorial Hospital, Fraser Health, Critical Care Tower T2-820, 13750 96th Avenue, Surrey, BC, V3V 1Z2, Canada.
Andrew McDonaldClinical Research, Surrey Memorial Hospital, Fraser Health, Critical Care Tower T2-820, 13750 96th Avenue, Surrey, BC, V3V 1Z2, Canada.
Grace ParkDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Xiaowei SongClinical Research, Surrey Memorial Hospital, Fraser Health, Critical Care Tower T2-820, 13750 96th Avenue, Surrey, BC, V3V 1Z2, Canada. xiaowei.song@fraserhealth.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA crucial aspect of continued senior care is the early detection and management of frailty. Developing reliable and secure electronic frailty assessment tools can benefit virtual appointments, a need especially relevant in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. An emerging effort has targeted web-based software applications to improve accessibility and usage. The objectives of this scoping review are to identify and evaluate web-based frailty assessment tools currently available and to identify challenges and opportunities for future development.

methodsWe conducted a review with literature (e.g., using MEDLINE databases) and Google searches (last updated on October 10, 2021). Each of the identified web applications were assessed based on eight featured categories and assigned a rating score accordingly.

resultsTwelve web-based frailty assessment applications were found, chiefly provided by the USA (50%) or European countries (41%) and focused on frailty grading and outcome prediction for specific patient groups (59%). Categories that scored well among the applications included the User Interface (2.8/3) and the Cost (2.7/3). Other categories had a mean score of 1.6/3 or lower. The least developed feature was Data Saving.

conclusionsWeb-based applications represent a viable option for remote frailty assessments and multidisciplinary integrated care of older adults. Despite the available web-based frailty assessments on the Internet, many missed certain needed features for professional use in healthcare settings. This situation calls for fully comprehensive web-based applications, taking into consideration a number of key functions linking graphical user interface and functionalities, and paying special attention to secure data management.

Indexed as

COVID-19FrailtyAgedHumansInternetPandemicsSARS-CoV-2SoftwareComprehensive geriatric assessmentDigital healthFrailty assessmentsWeb applicationsWeb-based software

Identifiers

PMID34922466
PMCPMC8683817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.