Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34922460›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2021

ddPCR allows 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of very small DNA amounts from low-biomass samples.

Isabel Abellan-Schneyder, Andrea Janina Schusser, Klaus Neuhaus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Modified percutaneous vertebral body-intervertebral disc biopsy combined with genetic testing for the diagnosis of early-stage pyogenic spondylodiscitis: a retrospective cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Insights intoMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Definitions of Dysbiosis in Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction and High Bacterial Biomass.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isabel Abellan-SchneyderCore Facility Microbiome, ZIEL - Institute for Food & Health, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany.
Andrea Janina SchusserCore Facility Microbiome, ZIEL - Institute for Food & Health, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany.
Klaus NeuhausCore Facility Microbiome, ZIEL - Institute for Food & Health, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany. neuhaus@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6020-2814

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne limiting factor of short amplicon 16S rRNA gene sequencing approaches is the use of low DNA amounts in the amplicon generation step. Especially for low-biomass samples, insufficient or even commonly undetectable DNA amounts can limit or prohibit further analysis in standard protocols.

resultsUsing a newly established protocol, very low DNA input amounts were found sufficient for reliable detection of bacteria using 16S rRNA gene sequencing compared to standard protocols. The improved protocol includes an optimized amplification strategy by using a digital droplet PCR. We demonstrate how PCR products are generated even when using very low concentrated DNA, unable to be detected by using a Qubit. Importantly, the use of different 16S rRNA gene primers had a greater effect on the resulting taxonomical profiles compared to using high or very low initial DNA amounts.

conclusionOur improved protocol takes advantage of ddPCR and allows faithful amplification of very low amounts of template. With this, samples of low bacterial biomass become comparable to those with high amounts of bacteria, since the first and most biasing steps are the same. Besides, it is imperative to state DNA concentrations and volumes used and to include negative controls indicating possible shifts in taxonomical profiles. Despite this, results produced by using different primer pairs cannot be easily compared.

Indexed as

BiomassBacteriaBiasDNA, BacterialFecesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLimit of DetectionMicrobiotaPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNAWater MicrobiologyDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene sequencingddPCRLow-biomass samplesVery small DNA amounts

Identifiers

PMID34922460
PMCPMC8684222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.