Observational studyThe journal of headache and pain2021
Discontinuing monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP pathway after one-year treatment: an observational longitudinal cohort study.
Observational study in The journal of headache and pain, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05442008 (Study of Early MIDAS Reduction at 3 Months as Predictor of Long-term Erenumab Treatment in Chronic Migraine), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study of Early MIDAS Reduction at 3 Months as Predictor of Long-term Erenumab Treatment in Chronic Migraine: a Real-life, Open-label, Trial
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of galcanezumab for the treatment of migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Headache · 2026Pooled it
- CROATIAN GUIDELINES FOR SPECIFIC PREVENTIVE TREATMENT OF MIGRAINE WITH MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES TARGETING CALCITONIN GENE-RELATED PEPTIDE (CGRP) (EPTINEZUMAB, FREMANEZUMAB, AND GALCANEZUMAB) OR THE CGRP RECEPTOR (ERENUMAB).Acta clinica Croatica · 2024Guideline
- Methodological considerations on real-world evidence studies of monoclonal antibodies against the CGRP-pathway for migraine: a systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Treatment of resistant chronic migraine with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies: a systematic review.European journal of medical research · 2022Pooled it
- The effect of erenumab on brain network function in episodic migraine patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (RESET BRAIN).Journal of neurology · 2023Trial
- Does MIDAS reduction at 3 months predict the outcome of erenumab treatment? A real-world, open-label trial.The journal of headache and pain · 2022Trial
- Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody Utilization and Treatment Gaps in People with Migraine in Japan: Results from the OVERCOME (Japan) 2nd Study.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2026Article
- Response to Galcanezumab in a Patient with Complex Neuropsychiatric Comorbidity: A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Migraine, monoclonal antibodies, and monitoring: a review of pharmacovigilance in the era of biologics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Late response to anti-CGRP therapy for migraine.Pain management · 2025Review
- Disrupting Migraine Dynamics: A Narrative Review of the Consequences of Modern Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibody Therapies.Neurology and therapy · 2025Review
- Effects of Pausing and Re-Initiating Fremanezumab After Continuous 24-Month Treatment for Preventing Difficult-To-Treat Migraine: Prospective, Multicenter, Real-World Data From the GRASP Study Group.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Migraine treatment with CGRP monoclonal antibodies: patient evaluation of a mandatory treatment holiday in Belgium.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2025Article
- Efficacy of MEDI0618, a pH-dependent monoclonal antibody targeting PAR2, in preclinical models of migraine.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted therapies for migraine.Australian prescriber · 2025Review
- Three-year treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies modifies migraine course: the prospective, multicenter I-GRAINE study.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Potential Predictors of Response to CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Chronic Migraine: Real-World Data.Current pain and headache reports · 2024Review
- Enhancing Acute Migraine Treatment: Exploring Solid Lipid Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Lipid Carriers for the Nose-to-Brain Route.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies: Key Lessons from Real-World Evidence.Brain sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMonoclonal antibodies anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (mAbs anti-CGRP) pathway are effective and safe on migraine prevention. However, some drug agencies limited these treatments to one year due to their high costs. This study aimed at evaluating the effect of discontinuing mAbs anti-CGRP on monthly migraine days (MMDs) and disability in high-frequency episodic (HFEM) and chronic migraine (CM) patients.
methodsThis observational longitudinal cohort study was conducted at 10 Italian headache centres. Consecutive adult patients were followed-up for three months (F-UP1-3) after discontinuation of a one-year erenumab/galcanezumab treatment. The primary endpoint was the change in F-UP MMDs. Secondary endpoints included variation in pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale, NRS), monthly acute medication intake (MAMI), and HIT-6 scores. We also assessed from F-UP1 to 3 the ≥50% response rate, relapse rate to CM, and recurrence of Medication Overuse (MO).
resultsWe enrolled 154 patients (72.1% female, 48.2 ± 11.1 years, 107 CM, 47 HFEM); 91 were treated with erenumab, 63 with galcanezumab. From F-UP1 to F-UP3, MMDs, MAMI, NRS, and HIT-6 progressively increased but were still lower at F-UP3 than baseline (Friedman's analysis of rank, p < .001). In the F-UP1-3 visits, ≥50% response rate frequency did not differ significantly between CM and HFEM patients. However, the median reduction in response rate at F-UP3 was higher in HFEM (- 47.7% [25th, - 79.5; 75th,-17.0]) than in CM patients (- 25.5% [25th, - 47.1; 75th, - 3.3]; Mann-Whitney U test; p = .032). Of the 84 baseline CM patients who had reverted to episodic migraine, 28 (33.3%) relapsed to CM at F-UP1, 35 (41.7%) at F-UP2, 39 (46.4%) at F-UP3. Of the 64 baseline patients suffering of medication overuse headache ceasing MO, 15 (18.3%) relapsed to MO at F-UP1, 26 (31.6%) at F-UP2, and 30 (42.3%, 11 missing data) at F-UP3. Lower MMDs, MAMI, NRS, and HIT-6 and higher response rate in the last month of therapy characterized patients with ≥50% response rate at F-UP1 and F-UP3 (Mann-Whitney U test; consistently p < .01).
conclusionMigraine frequency and disability gradually increased after mAbs anti-CGRP interruption. Most patients did not relapse to MO or CM despite the increase in MMDs. Our data suggest to reconsider mAbs anti-CGRP discontinuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.