Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34922436›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of headache and pain2021

Impact of age and sex on the efficacy of fremanezumab in patients with difficult-to-treat migraine: results of the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3b FOCUS study.

Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink, Gisela M Terwindt, Joshua M Cohen, Steve Barash, Verena Ramirez Campos, Maja Galic, Xiaoping Ning, Mikko Kärppä

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of headache and pain, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03308968 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study With an Open-Label Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fremanezumab for the Prophylactic Treatment of Migraine in Patients With Inadequate Response to Prior Preventive Treatments), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03308968 phase3completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study With an Open-Label Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fremanezumab for the Prophylactic Treatment of Migraine in Patients With Inadequate Response to Prior Preventive Treatments

TypeinterventionalSponsorTeva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.Ran2017 to 2019Enrolled838ConditionsMigraine ProphylaxisArmsFremanezumab, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Sex-specific considerations in migraine therapy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  4. Drugs for Migraine Prophylaxis.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Migraine in men.The journal of headache and pain · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrinkDivision of Pharmacology and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.vanharen-maassenvandenbrink@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7176-126X
Gisela M TerwindtDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Joshua M CohenTeva Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., PA, West Chester, USA.
Steve BarashTeva Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., PA, West Chester, USA.
Verena Ramirez CamposTeva Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., PA, West Chester, USA.
Maja GalicTeva Pharmaceuticals Europe B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Xiaoping NingTeva Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., PA, West Chester, USA.
Mikko KärppäResearch Unit of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oulu and Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Teva Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USErasmus MC · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLOulu University Hospital · FITeva Pharmaceuticals (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigraine prevalence is age and sex dependent, predominating in women in early and middle adulthood; however, migraine also represents a substantial burden for men and adults of all ages. Thus, understanding this burden and the efficacy of migraine preventive medications in both sexes and across age groups is critical. The randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3b FOCUS study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of fremanezumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2∆a) that selectively targets calcitonin gene-related peptide as a migraine preventive treatment for individuals with migraine and prior inadequate response to 2 to 4 migraine preventive medication classes. Here, we assessed the efficacy of fremanezumab in participants from FOCUS subgrouped by age (18-45 years and > 45 years) and sex.

methodsIn the FOCUS study, eligible participants were randomized (1:1:1) to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with quarterly fremanezumab, monthly fremanezumab, or matched monthly placebo. In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated changes from baseline in monthly migraine days (primary endpoint of FOCUS) and other secondary and exploratory efficacy outcomes in prespecified age (18-45 and > 45 years) and sex subgroups.

resultsThe modified intention-to-treat population (received ≥ 1 dose of study drug and had ≥ 10 days of postbaseline efficacy assessments for the primary endpoint) totaled 837 participants (18-45 years, n = 373; > 45 years, n = 464; male, n = 138; female, n = 699). Consistent reductions in monthly average number of migraine days during 12 weeks were observed, regardless of age (18-45 years: quarterly fremanezumab, - 4.1 days; monthly fremanezumab, - 4.7 days; placebo, - 0.9 days; P < 0.001; > 45 years: quarterly fremanezumab, - 3.6 days; monthly fremanezumab, - 3.7 days; placebo, - 0.3 days; P < 0.001) and sex (male: quarterly fremanezumab, - 4.1 days; monthly fremanezumab, - 4.6 days; placebo, - 0.3 days; P < 0.001; female: quarterly fremanezumab, - 3.6 days; monthly fremanezumab, - 3.9 days; placebo, - 0.6 days; P < 0.001). Fremanezumab also reduced monthly headache days of at least moderate severity, monthly days of acute medication use, and improved Migraine Disability Assessment scores across subgroups.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate the efficacy of fremanezumab in patients with difficult-to-treat migraine for reducing migraine and headache days, acute medication use, and disability, regardless of age or sex.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03308968 (FOCUS), registered October 13, 2017.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalMigraine DisordersAdolescentAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptidefremanezumabAgeCalcitonin gene-related peptideFremanezumabMigraineSex

Identifiers

PMID34922436
PMCPMC8903667
OpenAlexW4200446919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.