Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34922354›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2022

Nanoforms of essential metals: from hormetic phytoeffects to agricultural potential.

Zsuzsanna Kolbert, Réka Szőllősi, Andrea Rónavári, Árpád Molnár

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zsuzsanna KolbertDepartment of Plant Biology University of Szeged, Közép fasor 52, Szeged H6726, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-7819-4672
Réka SzőllősiDepartment of Plant Biology University of Szeged, Közép fasor 52, Szeged H6726, Hungary.
Andrea RónaváriDepartment of Applied and Environmental Chemistry, University of Szeged, Rerrich Béla tér 1, Szeged H6720, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-7054-0975
Árpád MolnárDepartment of Plant Biology University of Szeged, Közép fasor 52, Szeged H6726, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vital plant functions require at least six metals (copper, iron, molybdenum, manganese, zinc, and nickel), which function as enzyme cofactors or inducers. In recent decades, rapidly evolving nanotechnology has created nanoforms of essential metals and their compounds (e.g. nZnO, nFe2O3) with a number of favourable properties over the bulk materials. The effects of nanometals on plants are concentration-dependent (hormesis) but also depend on the properties of the nanometals, the plant species, and the treatment conditions. Here, we review studies examining plant responses to essential nanometal treatments using a (multi)omics approach and emphasize the importance of gaining a holistic view of the diverse effects. Furthermore, we discuss the beneficial effects of essential nanometals on plants, which provide the basis for their application in crop production as, for example, nanopriming or nanostimulator agents, or nanofertilizers. As lower environmental impact and increased yield can be achieved by the application of essential nanometals, they support sustainable agriculture. Recent studies have actively examined the utilization of green-synthesized metal nanoparticles, which perfectly fit into the environmentally friendly trend of future agriculture. Further knowledge is required before essential nanometals can be safely applied in agriculture, but it is a promising direction that is timely to investigate.

Indexed as

AgricultureHormesisCrop ProductionMetalsNanotechnologyPlantsMetalsHormesisnanofertilizationnanometalsnanoprimingnutrient deficiencyomics

Identifiers

PMID34922354
PMCPMC8921003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.