Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34922326›Full record

ArticleEpilepsy & behavior : E&B2022

Barriers to telemedicine among physicians in epilepsy care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A national-level cross-sectional survey in Japan.

Takafumi Kubota, Naoto Kuroda, Toru Horinouchi, Naoki Ikegaya, Yu Kitazawa, Satoshi Kodama, Izumi Kuramochi, Teppei Matsubara, Naoto Nagino, Shuichiro Neshige and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The impact of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic on educational and professional growth of young Italian epileptologists: a survey of the Young Epilepsy Section-Italian chapter.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Takafumi KubotaJapan Young Epilepsy Section, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Neurology, University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Neurology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan. Electronic address: takafumi.kubota.c7@tohoku.ac.jp.
Naoto KurodaJapan Young Epilepsy Section, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Epileptology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan; Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Toru HorinouchiJapan Young Epilepsy Section, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Psychiatry and Neurology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Naoki IkegayaJapan Young Epilepsy Section, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan. Electronic address: nikegaya@yokohama-cu.ac.jp.
Yu KitazawaJapan Young Epilepsy Section, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Neurology and Stroke Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Satoshi KodamaJapan Young Epilepsy Section, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Izumi KuramochiJapan Young Epilepsy Section, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Psychiatry, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.
Teppei MatsubaraJapan Young Epilepsy Section, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Naoto NaginoJapan Young Epilepsy Section, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan; Epilepsy Center, TMG Asaka Medical Center, Asaka, Saitama, Japan.
Shuichiro NeshigeJapan Young Epilepsy Section, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Therapeutics, Hiroshima University, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
Temma SogaJapan Young Epilepsy Section, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Neurology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan; Department of Epileptology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Yutaro TakayamaJapan Young Epilepsy Section, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Neurosurgery, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan.
Daichi SoneJapan Young Epilepsy Section, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Yokohama City University · JPHiroshima University · JPHokkaido University · JPMassachusetts General Hospital · USNational Center of Neurology and Psychiatry · JPSocial Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPTohoku University · JPUniversity College London · GBUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · USWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the factors affecting the unwillingness of physicians involved in epilepsy care to continue telemedicine during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Japan.

methodThis was a national-level cross-sectional survey initiated by Japan Young Epilepsy Section (YES-Japan) which is a national chapter of The Young Epilepsy Section of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE-YES). We asked physicians who conducted telemedicine in patients with epilepsy (PWE) during the COVID-19 pandemic at four clinics and 21 hospitals specializing in epilepsy care in Japan from March 1 to April 30, 2021. The following data were collected: (1) participant profile, (2) characteristics of PWE treated by telemedicine, and (3) contents and environmental factors of telemedicine. Statistically significant variables (p < 0.05) in the univariate analysis were analyzed in a multivariate binary logistic regression model to detect the independently associated factors with the unwillingness to continue telemedicine.

resultAmong the 115 respondents (response rate: 64%), 89 were included in the final analysis. Of them, 60 (67.4%) were willing to continue telemedicine, and 29 (32.6%) were unwilling. In the univariate binary logistic regression analysis, age (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-3.09, p = 0.02), psychiatrist (OR = 5.88, 95% CI 2.15-16.08, p = 0.001), hospital (OR = 0.10, 95% CI 0.01-0.94, p = 0.04), the number of COVID-19 risk factors in the participant (OR = 2.88, 95% CI 1.46-5.69, p = 0.002), the number of COVID-19 risk factors in the cohabitants (OR = 2.52, 95% CI 1.05-6.01, p = 0.04), COVID-19 epidemic area (OR = 4.37, 95% CI 1.18-16.20, p = 0.03), consultation time during telemedicine (OR = 2.51, 95% CI 1.32-4.76, p = 0.005), workload due to telemedicine (OR = 4.17, 95% CI 2.11-8.24, p < 0.001) were statistically significant. In the multivariate binary logistic regression analysis, workload due to telemedicine (OR = 4.93, 95% CI 1.96-12.35) was independently associated with the unwillingness to continue telemedicine.

conclusionThis national-level cross-sectional survey found that workload due to telemedicine among physicians involved in epilepsy care was independently associated with the unwillingness to continue telemedicine.

Indexed as

COVID-19EpilepsyPhysiciansTelemedicineCross-Sectional StudiesHumansJapanPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesBarrierCOVID-19EpilepsySeizureTelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34922326
PMCPMC9759923
OpenAlexW4200565258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.