Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34921742›Full record

ArticleExperimental physiology2022

A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity.

Stefan Orter, Stefan Möstl, Martin Bachler, Fabian Hoffmann, Christopher C Mayer, Eugenijus Kaniusas, Michaela Reisinger, Siegfried Wassertheurer, Jens Tank, Jens Jordan and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefan OrterCenter for Health & Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9258-6069
Stefan MöstlInstitute of Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center, Cologne, Germany.
Martin BachlerCenter for Health & Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Fabian HoffmannInstitute of Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center, Cologne, Germany.
Christopher C MayerCenter for Health & Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Eugenijus KaniusasInstitute of Electrodynamics, Microwave and Circuit Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Michaela ReisingerCenter for Health & Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Siegfried WassertheurerCenter for Health & Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Jens TankInstitute of Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center, Cologne, Germany.
Jens JordanInstitute of Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center, Cologne, Germany.
Bernhard HametnerCenter for Health & Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2048-1019
Austrian Institute of Technology · ATDeutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) · DETU Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NEW

findingsWhat is the central question of this study? First, we validated easy-to-use oscillometric left ventricular ejection time (LVET) against echocardiographic LVET. Second, we investigated progression of left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI), pre-ejection period index (PEPI), total electromechanical systole index (QS2I) and PEP/LVET ratio during 60 days of head-down tilt (HDT). What is the main finding and its importance? The LVET ABSTRACT: Systolic time intervals that are easy to detect might be used as parameters reflecting cardiovascular deconditioning. We compared left ventricular ejection time (LVET) measured via ultrasound Doppler on the left ventricular outflow tract with oscillometrically measured LVET, measured at the brachialis. Furthermore, we assessed the progression of the left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI), the pre-ejection period index (PEPI), the Weissler index (PEP/LVET) and the total electromechanical systole index (QS2I) during prolonged strict head-down tilt (HDT) bed rest, including 16 male and eight female subjects. Simultaneous oscillometric and echocardiographic LVET measurements showed significant correlation (r = 0.53 with P = 0.0084 before bed rest and r = 0.73 with P < 0.05 on the last day of bed rest). The shortening of LVET during HDT bed rest measured with both approaches was highly concordant in their effect direction, with a concordance rate of 0.96. Our results also demonstrated a significant decrease of LVETI (P < 0.0001) and QS2I (P = 0.0992) and a prolongation of PEPI (P = 0.0049) and PEP/LVET (P = 0.0003) during HDT bed rest over 60 days. Four days after bed rest, LVETI recovered completely to its baseline value. Owing to the relationship between shortening of LVETI and heart failure progression, the easy-to-use oscillometric method might not only be a useful way to evaluate the cardiovascular system during space flights, but could also be of high value in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

WeightlessnessBed RestFemaleHead-Down TiltHeartHumansMaleMyocardial ContractionSystolehead-down tilt bed restleft ventricular ejection timeoscillometrysystolic time intervalsvalidation

Identifiers

PMID34921742
PMCPMC9303723
OpenAlexW4200078593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.