Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34921730›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2022

Endometrial cancer prognosis in women with endometriosis and adenomyosis: A retrospective nationwide cohort study of 40 840 women.

Marjolein Hermens, Anne M van Altena, Maaike van der Aa, Johan Bulten, Huib A A M van Vliet, Albert G Siebers, Ruud L M Bekkers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marjolein HermensDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4994-4905
Anne M van AltenaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Maaike van der AaDepartment of Research, Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Johan BultenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Belgium, Ghent.
Huib A A M van VlietDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Albert G SiebersPALGA, The Nationwide Network and Registry of Histo- and Cytopathology in the Netherlands, Houten, The Netherlands.
Ruud L M BekkersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLGhent University Hospital · BENetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLNetherlands Heart Registration · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aim to compare endometrial cancer survival in women with or without histological proven endometriosis or adenomyosis. We identified all women with endometrial cancer between 1990 and 2015 from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Data were linked to the Dutch pathology database (PALGA) to select all women with histological proven endometriosis/adenomyosis. Overall survival was compared between women with endometrial cancer with or without endometriosis/adenomyosis. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). We included 1701 women with endometrial cancer and endometriosis/adenomyosis, of whom 1236 (72.7%) women had adenomyosis, 320 (18.8%) had endometriosis and 145 (8.5%) had both. We compared these women to 39 139 women with endometrial cancer without endometriosis/adenomyosis. Women in the combined endometriosis/adenomyosis cohort were younger at endometrial cancer diagnosis, had earlier disease stage, more often had endometrioid endometrial cancer and low grade tumors. The 5-year survival rate in the combined endometriosis/adenomyosis cohort was 84.8% (95% CI 84.6-88.1) and 71.6% (95% CI 71.1-72.0) in the nonendometriosis/adenomyosis cohort. Univariable analysis resulted in a crude HR of 0.63 (95% CI 0.59-0.69). Significant confounding factors were age, stage, cancer subtype, histological grading, surgery and chemotherapy rate. Correction for these confounders resulted in a HR of 0.98 (95% CI 0.90-1.06). Including endometriosis/adenomyosis status as a categorical factor resulted in similar HRs. In conclusion, women with endometrial cancer and histologically proven endometriosis/adenomyosis have a better overall survival when compared to women with endometrial cancer without endometriosis/adenomyosis. This better survival was correlated to stage, grade, age and histological subtype, but not to the presence of endometriosis/adenomyosis.

Indexed as

AdenomyosisEndometrial NeoplasmsEndometriosisCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPrognosisRetrospective Studiesadenomyosisendometrial cancerendometriosisprognosis

Identifiers

PMID34921730
PMCPMC9303796
OpenAlexW4200625185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.