Trial reportAdvances in therapy2022
Interpretation of the Meaningfulness of Symptom Reduction with Vibegron in Patients with Overactive Bladder: Analyses from EMPOWUR.
Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03492281 (An International Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An International Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active (Tolterodine)-Controlled Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Vibegron in Patients With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A randomized, unblinded, controlled clinical study to assess the mobile digital health application INKA in the management of therapy refractory overactive bladder and mixed incontinence.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Vibegron for Persistent Symptoms of Overactive Bladder in Men Being Pharmacologically Treated for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Results From the Phase 3 Randomized Controlled COURAGE Trial.The Journal of urology · 2024Trial
- Biomechanical regulation of bladder injury and repair.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Efficacy of Vibegron in Overactive Bladder: A Bayesian Cross-Trial Synthesis of Benefit Probabilities and Decision Thresholds.Lower urinary tract symptoms · 2026Article
- Vibegron in overactive bladder: a comprehensive review of efficacy, safety and patient-reported outcomes.World journal of urology · 2025Review
- Protocol for a Series of Systematic Reviews and Network Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials of Medications for Patients with Overactive Bladder Symptoms.European urology open science · 2024Article
- Online Group-based Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Urinary Incontinence in Older Women: a Pilot Study.International urogynecology journal · 2024Article
- Oral anticholinergic drugs versus placebo or no treatment for managing overactive bladder syndrome in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Study design of a phase 4, real-world study (COMPOSUR) to evaluate vibegron in patients with overactive bladder.BMC urology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionReductions in bothersome symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) demonstrate improvement in clinical trials, but patient perception of meaningfulness of such improvement is lacking. In the 12-week phase 3 EMPOWUR trial, vibegron significantly reduced average daily number of micturitions, urgency episodes, and urge urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes vs placebo (P < 0.01 each). This analysis assessed meaningfulness of reductions in clinical endpoints observed in EMPOWUR using patient perception of improvement.
methodsAn anchor-based approach using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) applied to phase 2 data allowed predefining phase 3 responder definitions. To confirm in phase 3, median change from baseline at week 12 in average daily number of micturitions, urgency episodes, and UUI episodes was generated for each PGI-C category and pooled across treatments. Based on predefined meaningful responder definitions, percentages of patients achieving ≥ 15% reduction in micturitions (post hoc), ≥ 50% reduction in urgency episodes (predefined), and ≥ 75% (predefined) and ≥ 90% (post hoc) reduction in UUI episodes were determined for patients receiving vibegron or placebo.
resultsAcross treatments, for micturitions, urgency episodes, and UUI episodes, median change from baseline to week 12 increased with greater subjective improvement based on PGI-C scores, and median reductions pooled across treatment groups were higher than the responder definitions that patients perceived as improved. Significantly more patients receiving vibegron vs placebo achieved ≥ 15% reduction in micturitions (56.3% vs 44.6%, respectively), ≥ 50% reduction in urgency episodes (39.5% vs 32.8%), ≥ 75% reduction in UUI episodes (49.3% vs 32.8%), and ≥ 90% reduction in UUI episodes (35.2% vs 23.5%) at week 12 (P < 0.05 each).
conclusionSignificantly more patients treated with vibegron vs placebo in EMPOWUR achieved meaningful reductions in micturitions, urgency episodes, and UUI episodes that were associated with patient-perceived improvement. Results of these analyses support the meaningfulness of reductions in clinical endpoints observed in the 12-week EMPOWUR trial. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03492281.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.