Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34921654›Full record

Trial reportJournal of youth and adolescence2022

Understanding for Which Students and Classes a Socio-Ecological Aggression Prevention Program Works Best: Testing Individual Student and Class Level Moderators.

Lisa Bardach, Takuya Yanagida, Petra Gradinger, Dagmar Strohmeier

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lisa BardachUniversity of Tübingen, Hector Research Institute of Education Sciences and Psychology, Walter-Simon-Straße 12, 72072, Tübingen, Germany. lisa.bardach@uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2168-3117
Takuya YanagidaUniversity of Vienna, Faculty of Psychology, Universitätsstraße 7, 1010, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9052-4841
Petra GradingerUniversity of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, School of Applied Health and Social Sciences, Garnisonstraße 21, 4020, Linz, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9374-2761
Dagmar StrohmeierUniversity of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, School of Applied Health and Social Sciences, Garnisonstraße 21, 4020, Linz, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1479-6674

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

School-based aggression prevention programs may not be equally effective for all students and classes, depending on student and class characteristics. This study investigated moderators of a cluster randomized controlled socio-ecological aggression prevention program's effectiveness (change from pretest to posttest, sample: 2,042 preadolescents, mean age = 11.7 years, SD = 0.09, 47.6% girls) and sustainability (change from posttest to follow-up test, sample: 659 preadolescents, mean age = 12.7 years, SD = 0.08, 47.9% girls). The program worked better in multicultural classes, as greater ethnic diversity strengthened the program's effectiveness and sustainability. Moderating effects of a positive social class climate and higher baseline levels of aggressive behavior and victimization were also found. These results advance socio-ecological theorizing and can help develop more contextualized interventions.

Indexed as

BullyingCrime VictimsAggressionChildFemaleHumansMaleSchool Health ServicesStudentsAggressive behavior, Victimization, Randomized controlled, Moderator, Effectiveness, Climate, Ethnic diversity

Identifiers

PMID34921654
PMCPMC8828596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.