Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34921627›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2021

Isolation and characterization of Bacillus spp. from aquaculture cage water and its inhibitory effect against selected Vibrio spp.

E Uzun Yaylacı

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Biotechnology revival:Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

E Uzun YaylacıFaculty of Marine Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University, 61530, Surmene, Trabzon, Turkey. ecrenuzun@ktu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2558-2487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the probiotic potential of Bacillus strains with antibacterial activity against Vibrio spp. in vitro. 13 Bacillus strains were selected using Bacillus-selective agar. Among the strains elected in the preliminary screening for antagonistic effect, only the strain PJ_11 with better antibacterial ability was selected and used in further experiments. Based on the morphological and biochemical features with phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA sequencing, selected strain was identified as B. pumilus. PJ_11 showed probiotic properties such as able to survive in wide range of temperatures and salinity, tolerance to 0.3% oxgal and pH 2.0, and high cell-adhesion activity. In this study, there was no special feature regarding the inhibitory effect of the isolate against Gram-positive or Gram-negative indicator bacteria. However, the inhibition effect of the culture was found to be greater than that of the supernatant. PJ_11 exhibited strong antibacterial activity against Vibrio vulnificus, Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio anguillarum that were isolated from fish (Dicentrarchus labrax) with disease symptoms. The inhibition diameter of strain PJ_11 ranged from 17.63 to 26.68 mm. In co-culture assay with the strain PJ_11 culture, the growth of V. vulnificus, V. parahaemolyticus and V. anguillarum was inhibited after 120 h with an initial level of 1.0 × 10

Indexed as

BacillusVibrioAquaculturePhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWaterRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWaterAntibacterial activityBacillusProbioticVibrio spp.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.