Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34921612›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Olfactory adaptation: recordings from the human olfactory epithelium.

Coralie Mignot, Anica Schunke, Charlotte Sinding, Thomas Hummel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Coralie MignotTU Dresden, Smell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, House 5, Basement, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. coraliemignot.pro@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4763-7186
Anica SchunkeTU Dresden, Smell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, House 5, Basement, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Charlotte SindingDepartment French National Institute for Agricultural Research, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation (CSGA), Dijon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0887-4429
Thomas HummelTU Dresden, Smell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, House 5, Basement, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Taste and Smell Clinic · USUniversité de Bourgogne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOlfactory adaptation is a peripheral (at the epithelium level) or a central (at the brain level) mechanism resulting from repeated or prolonged odorous exposure that can induce a perceptual decrease. The aim of this study was to assess whether a peripheral adaptation occurs when an odor is repeated ten times. Moreover, the specificity of the peripheral adaptation to the nature of the odorant was investigated.

methodsFour odorants (eugenol, manzanate, ISO E Super and phenylethanol) were presented using precisely controlled air-dilution olfactometry. They differed in terms of their physicochemical properties. Electrophysiological recordings were made at the level of the olfactory mucosa, the so-called electro-olfactogram (EOG). Thirty-five right-handed participants were recruited.

resultsSixty-nine percent of the participants presented at least one EOG, whatever the odor condition. The EOG amplitude did not significantly decrease over 10 repeated exposures to any odorant. The intensity ratings tended to decrease over stimulations for manzanate, PEA, and eugenol. No correlation was found between the mean EOG amplitudes and the mean intensity ratings. However, the presence of EOG amplitude decreases over stimulations for few subjects suggests that peripheral adaptation might exist.

conclusionOverall, our results did not establish a clear peripheral adaptation measured with EOG but indicate the eventuality of such an effect.

Indexed as

EugenolSmellHumansOdorantsOlfactory MucosaEugenolAdaptationElectro-olfactogramEOGHabituationIntensityRepeated stimulations

Identifiers

PMID34921612
PMCPMC9130158
OpenAlexW4200489576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.