Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34921429›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2022

Impacts of global change on the phyllosphere microbiome.

Yong-Guan Zhu, Chao Xiong, Zhong Wei, Qing-Lin Chen, Bin Ma, Shu-Yi-Dan Zhou, Jiaqi Tan, Li-Mei Zhang, Hui-Ling Cui, Gui-Lan Duan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparative Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yong-Guan ZhuKey Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, 361021, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3861-8482
Chao XiongState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3023-0494
Zhong WeiKey Laboratory of Plant Immunity, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory for Organic Solid Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, National Engineering Research Center for Organic-Based Fertilizers, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang, Nanjing, 210095, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7967-4897
Qing-Lin ChenFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5648-277X
Bin MaZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources and Environment, College of Environmental and Natural Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4807-4992
Shu-Yi-Dan ZhouKey Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, 361021, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2585-7305
Jiaqi TanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8357-1965
Li-Mei ZhangState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7383-8475
Hui-Ling CuiState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9203-5072
Gui-Lan DuanState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2880-5017

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants form complex interaction networks with diverse microbiomes in the environment, and the intricate interplay between plants and their associated microbiomes can greatly influence ecosystem processes and functions. The phyllosphere, the aerial part of the plant, provides a unique habitat for diverse microbes, and in return the phyllosphere microbiome greatly affects plant performance. As an open system, the phyllosphere is subjected to environmental perturbations, including global change, which will impact the crosstalk between plants and their microbiomes. In this review, we aim to provide a synthesis of current knowledge of the complex interactions between plants and the phyllosphere microbiome under global changes and to identify future priority areas of research on this topic.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPlantsclimate changemicrobesone healthphyllosphereplant microbiomeplant performance

Identifiers

PMID34921429
PMCPMC9306672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.