ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2023
[Development of a Return-to-work Intervention for Psychiatric Inpatients].
Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disclosure of mental illness towards employers during the return to work process after psychiatric hospitalization.BMC psychiatry · 2026Trial
- The cost-utility of a return-to-work intervention in comparison to routine care for patients with mental disorders in Germany: Results from the RETURN project.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023Trial
- How do employees currently admitted to acute psychiatric inpatient units rate their psychosocial working conditions with the COPSOQ (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire).The International journal of social psychiatry · 2023Trial
- Supporting return to work after psychiatric hospitalization-A cluster randomized study (RETURN-study).European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePatients with mental illnesses often face difficulties when returning to workplace after an episode of inpatient treatment. Available resources intended to support the return-to-work process are often not used. It was the aim of the present study to develop an intervention that facilitates the implementation of patient support at the interface of in- and outpatient care.
methodsWe used a structured development process for the establishment of a return-to-work intervention for psychiatric inpatients.
resultsThe intervention consisted of the use of return-to-work experts who worked on the basis of a manual. In clearly defined modules, patients were given information on social law basics and details of the return process. Difficult situations (e. g., dealing with the disclosure of the diagnosis, return interview) were discussed and rehearsed. After discharge, further care took place, above all with regard to experiences on the first working day, accompaniment to discussions with the employer and support with any other upcoming difficulties.
conclusionThe results of the ongoing study will show whether the chosen approach actually yields the expected results, namely an improvement of the return-to-work process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.