Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34921348›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2022

The retrocalcarine sulcus maps different retinotopic representations in macaques and humans.

Michael J Arcaro, Margaret S Livingstone, Kendrick N Kay, Kevin S Weiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Expansion of a conserved architecture drives the evolution of the primate visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A Whole-Brain Topographic Ontology.Annual review of neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael J ArcaroDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19146, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4612-9921
Margaret S LivingstoneDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Kendrick N KayCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Kevin S WeinerDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. kweiner@berkeley.edu.

Funding

Viral ModuleP30EY012196 · NEI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI Gabriel Kreiman · 1998 to 2026
$21.3M
Reverse Correlation Mapping in V2 and V4R01EY016187 · NEI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI LIVINGSTONE, MARGARET S · 2006 to 2021
$7.9M
The normal development of inferotemporal cortexR01EY025670 · NEI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI LIVINGSTONE, MARGARET S · 2015 to 2025
$5.7M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY012196NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025670NEI NIH HHS R01EY025670NEI NIH HHS R01EY16187NIH HHS P30EY012196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primate cerebral cortex is highly convoluted with much of the cortical surface buried in sulcal folds. The origins of cortical folding and its functional relevance have been a major focus of systems and cognitive neuroscience, especially when considering stereotyped patterns of cortical folding that are shared across individuals within a primate species and across multiple species. However, foundational questions regarding organizing principles shared across species remain unanswered. Taking a cross-species comparative approach with a careful consideration of historical observations, we investigate cortical folding relative to primary visual cortex (area V1). We identify two macroanatomical structures-the retrocalcarine and external calcarine sulci-in 24 humans and 6 macaque monkeys. We show that within species, these sulci are identifiable in all individuals, fall on a similar part of the V1 retinotopic map, and thus, serve as anatomical landmarks predictive of functional organization. Yet, across species, the underlying eccentricity representations corresponding to these macroanatomical structures differ strikingly across humans and macaques. Thus, the correspondence between retinotopic representation and cortical folding for an evolutionarily old structure like V1 is species-specific and suggests potential differences in developmental and experiential constraints across primates.

Indexed as

Visual CortexAnimalsBrain MappingHumansMacacaCalcarine sulcusComparative neuroanatomyHumanMacaqueStriate cortexVision

Identifiers

PMID34921348
PMCPMC9046316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.