ArticleBMJ open2021
Burden and impact of chronic cough in UK primary care: a dataset analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving Measurement Efficiency of the Cough Severity Index With Item Response Theory.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Nasal nitric oxide in post-acute COVID-19 cough: A comparison with chronic cough and the role of current allergic rhinitis.Medicine · 2026Article
- Observational
- Genomics of chronic dry cough unravels neurological pathways.The European respiratory journal · 2025Article
- Redefining chronic cough as a disease: why patient registries matter.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Article
- An observational study to understand burden and cost of care in adults diagnosed with refractory chronic cough (RCC) or unexplained chronic cough (UCC).Respiratory research · 2024Observational
- Epidemiology and Healthcare Service Utilization among Adults with Chronic Cough.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Prevalence and burden of chronic cough in France.ERJ open research · 2024Article
- Characteristics, demographics, and epidemiology of possible chronic cough in Sweden: A nationwide register-based cohort study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Gender Differences in Antitussive Prescriptions for Chronic Cough in Korea.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Consensus goals and standards for specialist cough clinics: the NEUROCOUGH international Delphi study.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- Patterns of Cough Medication Prescribing among Patients with Chronic Cough in Florida: 2012-2021.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Burden of chronic cough in the UK: results from the 2018 National Health and Wellness Survey.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- Chronic Cough-Related Differences in Brain Morphometry in Adults: A Population-Based Study.Chest · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveChronic cough (CC) is a debilitating respiratory symptom, now increasingly recognised as a discrete disease entity. This study evaluated the burden of CC in a primary care setting.
designCross-sectional, retrospective cohort study.
settingDiscover dataset from North West London, which links coded data from primary and secondary care. The index date depicted CC persisting for ≥8 weeks and was taken as a surrogate for date of CC diagnosis.
participantsData were extracted for individuals aged ≥18 years with a cough persisting ≥8 weeks or cough remedy prescription, between Jan 2015 and Sep 2019.
main outcome measuresDemographic characteristics, comorbidities and service utilisation cost, including investigations performed and treatments prescribed were determined.
resultsCC was identified in 43 453 patients from a total cohort of 2 109 430 (2%). Median (IQR) age was 64 years (41-87). Among the cohort, 31% had no recorded comorbidities, 26% had been given a diagnosis of asthma, 17% chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 12% rhinitis and 15% reflux. Prevalence of CC was greater in women (57%) and highest in the 65-74 year age range. There was an increase in the number of all investigations performed in the 12 months before and after the index date of CC diagnosis, and in particular for primary care chest X-ray and spirometry which increased from 6535 to 12 880 and from 5791 to 8720, respectively. This was accompanied by an increase in CC-associated healthcare utilisation costs.
conclusionOne-third of individuals had CC in the absence of associated comorbidities, highlighting the importance of recognising CC as a condition in its own right. Overall outpatient costs increased in the year after the CC index date for all comorbidities, but varied significantly with age. Linked primary-care datasets may enable earlier detection of individuals with CC for specialist clinic referral and targeted treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.